arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.18656hep-phastro-ph.CO
收藏

来自Planck、BICEP/Keck、ACT DR6和SPT-3G数据的暴胀与再加热吸引子模型约束

Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data

John Ellis, Marcos A. G. Garcia, Keith A. Olive, Sarunas Verner

AI总结:

本研究利用多组CMB观测数据约束暴胀吸引子模型,对比E、T模型及推广、形变模型的理论预测与观测结果,给出模型参数限制并分析不同模型与观测数据的相容性。

摘要:

我们分析了Planck 2018、BICEP/Keck 2018、阿塔卡马宇宙学望远镜第6批数据发布(ACT DR6)以及南极望远镜(SPT-3G)数据对宇宙微波背景(CMB)标量谱指数$n_s$和张量标量比$r$的最新约束,重点关注其对暴胀吸引子模型的启示。我们系统比较了观测边界与E模型($α$-Starobinsky模型)和T模型势的理论预测。观测约束支持$α\notag{\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$\textstyle\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$<$}$}\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$\textstyle\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$\thicksim$}$}$}25$的E模型,其中标准Starobinsky模型($α=1$)预测再加热温度在$100 - 10^{10}$ GeV范围内时$n_s = 0.958-0.963$,与Planck 2018数据吻合良好,处于Planck-ACT-SPT联合分析确定的95%置信区间内,但低于Planck-ACT-DESI联合分析的95%置信区间。近瞬时再加热带来的更高再加热温度会提升相容性。T模型预测的$n_s$值略低(0.956-0.961),与Planck 2018数据存在一定张力,我们发现这类模型中$α$的上限为$α\notag{\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$\textstyle\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$<$}$}\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$\textstyle\raise.17ex\raise.17ex\rlap{$\thicksim$}$}$}11$。我们将分析拓展到极小值附近势为单项式$V(φ) \not\to φ^k$的广义$α$-吸引子,证明$k \not\to 6$的模型在典型e折叠数下自然预测$n_s \not\to 0.965 - 0.968$,与ACT DR6数据更吻合。我们还考虑了形变E模型和T模型,这类模型在$α\not\to1$的低值下允许显著更高的$n_s$值。

英文摘要:

We analyze the latest cosmic microwave background (CMB) constraints on the scalar spectral index $n_s$ and tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ from Planck 2018, BICEP/Keck 2018, the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6 (ACT DR6), and the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G) data, focusing on their implications for attractor models of inflation. We compare systematically observational bounds with theoretical predictions for both E-model ($α$-Starobinsky) and T-model potentials. The observational constraints accommodate E-models with $α\lesssim 25$, with the canonical Starobinsky model ($α= 1$) predicting $n_s = 0.958-0.963$ for reheating temperatures between $100 - 10^{10}$ GeV, in good agreement with Planck 2018 data and within the 95% CL region determined by the Planck-ACT-SPT combination, but below the 95% confidence region of the Planck-ACT-DESI combination. Higher reheating temperatures from near-instantaneous reheating improve the compatibility. T-models predict slightly lower $n_s$ values (0.956-0.961), in some tension with Planck 2018 data, and we find an upper limit of $α\lesssim 11$ in these models. We extend our analysis to generalized $α$-attractors with monomial potentials $V(φ) \propto φ^k$ near the minimum, demonstrating that models with $k \geq 6$ naturally predict $n_s \simeq 0.965 - 0.968$ for typical number of $e$-folds, in better agreement with the ACT DR6 data. We also consider deformed E- and T-models, which allow significantly higher values of $n_s$ for low values of $α\simeq 1$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑