arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2510.10103cs.CL

适可而止:思维链推理的自适应早停机制

Stop When Enough: Adaptive Early-Stopping for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

UCLA;NEC Labs America;Arizona State University(亚利桑那州立大学)

Renliang Sun, Wei Cheng, Dawei Li, Haifeng Chen, Wei Wang

AI总结:

本文提出无需训练的框架REFRAIN,通过两阶段停止判别器和SW-UCB控制器自适应决定推理停止时机,有效缓解LLM过度思考,在保持准确率的同时减少20-55%的token使用。

摘要:

思维链(Chain-of-Thought, CoT)推理通过外化中间步骤,推动了大型语言模型(LLMs)在推理密集型任务上的近期进展。然而,过度或冗余的推理(即所谓的过度思考)会增加推理成本,并导致LLMs得出错误结论。本文提出了REFRAIN(用于自适应推理的反思-冗余框架),这是一个无需训练的框架,能够自适应地决定何时停止推理以缓解过度思考。REFRAIN集成了一个两阶段停止判别器,用于识别具有反思性但冗余的推理;以及一个滑动窗口上置信界(SW-UCB)多臂老虎机控制器,用于在无监督或微调的情况下根据问题难度动态调整停止阈值。在四个代表性基准和两个模型家族上,与标准CoT提示相比,REFRAIN在保持或提高准确率的同时,将token使用量减少了20-55%。广泛的消融和鲁棒性分析证明了其在不同模型、评分器和提示变化下的稳定性。总之,我们的发现强调了“何时停止”作为测试时缩放的一个全新且实用的轴——使模型不仅能推理得更多,而且恰到好处。

英文摘要:

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has driven recent gains of large language models (LLMs) on reasoning-intensive tasks by externalizing intermediate steps. However, excessive or redundant reasoning -- so-called overthinking -- can increase inference costs and lead LLMs toward incorrect conclusions. In this paper, we present REFRAIN ($\underline{REF}$lective-$\underline{R}$edundancy for $\underline{A}$daptive $\underline{IN}$ference), a training-free framework that adaptively determines when to stop reasoning to mitigate overthinking. REFRAIN integrates a two-stage stop discriminator to identify reflective yet redundant reasoning and a sliding-window Upper Confidence Bound (SW-UCB) multi-armed bandit controller to dynamically adjust stopping thresholds according to problem difficulty without supervision or fine-tuning. Across four representative benchmarks and two model families, REFRAIN reduces token usage by 20-55% while maintaining or improving accuracy compared to standard CoT prompting. Extensive ablation and robustness analyses demonstrate its stability across models, scorers, and prompt variations. In summary, our findings highlight when-to-stop as a new and practical axis of test-time scaling -- enabling models to reason not just more, but just enough.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑