arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.09872cs.LGcs.AI

WARC-Bench:基于网络存档的GUI子任务执行基准

WARC-Bench: Web Archive Based Benchmark for GUI Subtask Executions

Uniphore

Sanjari Srivastava, Gang Li, Cheng Chang, Rishu Garg, Manpreet Kaur, Charlene Y. Lee, Yuezhang Li, Yining Mao, Ignacio Cases, Yanan Xie, Peng Qi

AI总结:

本文提出WARC-Bench,一个基于网络存档的GUI子任务执行基准,通过438个任务评估多模态AI代理在子任务上的能力,实验表明SFT和RLVR方法在提升子任务执行效果上取得显著成果。

摘要:

训练能够导航复杂现实网站的网络代理需要它们掌握子任务——多个UI组件上的短周期交互(例如在日期选择器中选择正确日期或在容器中滚动以提取信息)。我们介绍了WARC-Bench(网络存档基准),一个新型的网络导航基准,包含438个任务,旨在评估多模态AI代理在子任务上的能力。WARC-Bench利用Web ARChive文件实现动态且逼真的网页沙盒交互。我们证明WARC-Bench对领先的计算机使用模型具有挑战性,最高观察到的成功率仅为64.8%。为了提高开源模型在子任务上的表现,我们探索了两种常见的训练技术:监督微调(SFT)和具有可验证奖励的强化学习(RLVR)。实验表明,SFT模型在基准上的成功率为48.8%。在数据稀缺的情况下,通过RLVR训练SFT检查点,将分数提高到52.8%,在WARC-Bench上优于许多前沿模型。我们的分析得出结论:掌握这些子任务对于稳健的网络规划和导航至关重要,而这一能力并未被现有基准充分评估。

英文摘要:

Training web agents to navigate complex, real-world websites requires them to master $\textit{subtasks}$ - short-horizon interactions on multiple UI components (e.g., choosing the correct date in a date picker, or scrolling in a container to extract information). We introduce WARC-Bench (Web Archive Benchmark), a novel web navigation benchmark featuring 438 tasks designed to evaluate multimodal AI agents on subtasks. WARC-Bench enables sandboxed interactions with dynamic and realistic webpages using Web ARChive files. We show that WARC-Bench is challenging for leading computer-use models, with the highest observed success rate being 64.8%. To improve open source models on subtask, we explore two common training techniques: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Experiments show that SFT models obtain a 48.8% success rate on the benchmark. Training with RLVR over SFT checkpoints, even in data-scarce settings, improves the score to 52.8% on WARC-Bench, outperforming many frontier models. Our analysis concludes that mastering these subtasks is essential for robust web planning and navigation, and is a capability not extensively evaluated by existing benchmarks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑