arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.08095stat.MLcs.LG

超越真实数据:通过正则化视角的合成数据

Beyond Real Data: Synthetic Data through the Lens of Regularization

Apple(苹果公司);University of Oxford(牛津大学);Big Data Institute(大数据研究所)

Amitis Shidani, Tyler Farghly, Yang Sun, Habib Ganjgahi, George Deligiannidis

AI总结:

本文通过正则化视角研究合成数据与真实数据的平衡,提出学习理论框架量化两者权衡,分析最优比例以最小化测试误差,并在CIFAR-10和临床脑MRI数据集上验证U型行为,扩展至领域适应场景。

摘要:

合成数据在真实数据稀缺时可提升泛化能力,但过度依赖可能引入分布不匹配问题。本文提出学习理论框架量化合成与真实数据的权衡,利用算法稳定性推导泛化误差界,刻画最优合成-真实数据比例以最小化预期测试误差,基于Wasserstein距离函数。在混合数据的核岭回归中,我们提供详细分析。理论预测存在最优比例,导致测试误差随合成数据比例呈U型变化。在CIFAR-10和临床脑MRI数据集上验证此预测。理论扩展至领域适应场景,显示合理混合合成目标数据与有限源数据可缓解领域偏移并提升泛化能力。最后提供在域内和域外场景应用的实践指导。

英文摘要:

Synthetic data can improve generalization when real data is scarce, but excessive reliance may introduce distributional mismatches that degrade performance. In this paper, we present a learning-theoretic framework to quantify the trade-off between synthetic and real data. Our approach leverages algorithmic stability to derive generalization error bounds, characterizing the optimal synthetic-to-real data ratio that minimizes expected test error as a function of the Wasserstein distance between the real and synthetic distributions. We motivate our framework in the setting of kernel ridge regression with mixed data, offering a detailed analysis that may be of independent interest. Our theory predicts the existence of an optimal ratio, leading to a U-shaped behavior of test error with respect to the proportion of synthetic data. Empirically, we validate this prediction on CIFAR-10 and a clinical brain MRI dataset. Our theory extends to the important scenario of domain adaptation, showing that carefully blending synthetic target data with limited source data can mitigate domain shift and enhance generalization. We conclude with practical guidance for applying our results to both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑