GraphMed-LT:面向多轮医疗对话的具有潜在临床思维优化的患者特定图记忆
GraphMed-LT: Patient-Specific Graph Memory with Latent Clinical Thought Refinement for Multi-Turn Medical Conversations
AI总结:
该研究针对多轮医疗对话中临床证据分散的问题,提出GraphMed-LT方法,通过患者特定图记忆及潜在临床思维优化,在多轮医疗QA任务上较基线实现显著提升。
摘要:
多轮医疗问答(QA)旨在模拟真实的临床诊断场景,即医生在多轮对话中收集患者信息。现有的多轮医疗对话系统已取得良好进展,但通常依赖累积的对话历史作为记忆,导致临床证据在多轮中分散。本文提出GraphMed-LT,一种面向多轮医疗对话的患者特定图记忆方法,带有潜在临床思维优化。GraphMed-LT从患者回复中提取患者特定的临床三元组,检索相关知识三元组,并将其组织为增量更新的图记忆。该图记忆被投影为图条件证据标记,并在可训练的医生智能体内部通过隐藏状态反馈进行优化,使智能体在提出后续问题或生成最终答案前更新其内部临床上下文。在三个多轮医疗QA基准上的实验表明,GraphMed-LT在多个大语言模型(LLM)骨干上始终优于现有的多轮医疗对话基线,比最强基线实现了高达6.3个百分点的绝对提升。进一步分析显示,GraphMed-LT提出更具可回答性的后续问题,且在各医学专科均能提供稳定增益。
英文摘要:
Multi-turn medical question answering (QA) aims to model realistic clinical diagnosis, where a doctor gathers patient information across multiple turns of conversation. Existing multi-turn medical conversation systems have shown promising progress, but they often rely on accumulated conversation histories as memory, leaving clinical evidence fragmented across turns. We propose GraphMed-LT, a patient-specific graph memory approach with latent clinical thought refinement for multi-turn medical conversations. GraphMed-LT extracts patient-specific clinical triplets from patient responses, retrieves relevant knowledge triplets, and organises them into an incrementally updated graph memory. The graph memory is projected into graph-conditioned evidence tokens and refined inside a trainable doctor agent through hidden-state feedback, enabling the agent to update its internal clinical context before asking follow-up questions or producing the final answer. Experiments on three multi-turn medical QA benchmarks show that GraphMed-LT consistently outperforms existing multi-turn medical conversation baselines across multiple LLM backbones, achieving up to a 6.3 percentage-point absolute improvement over the strongest baseline. Further analyses show that GraphMed-LT asks more answerable follow-up questions and provides consistent gains across medical specialties.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。