arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2509.22524cs.CV

视觉-语言模型中的颜色名称

Color Names in Vision-Language Models

Computer Vision Center(计算机视觉中心);Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona(巴塞罗那自治大学);Image Processing Lab, Universidad de Valencia(瓦伦西亚大学图像处理实验室)

Alexandra Gomez-Villa, Pablo Hernández-Cámara, Muhammad Atif Butt, Valero Laparra, Jesus Malo, Javier Vazquez-Corral

AI总结:

本文系统评估五个 VLM 对 957 个颜色样本的命名能力,揭示其在非原型颜色、跨语言均衡性及架构影响方面的表现与机制。

摘要:

颜色是人类视觉感知的基本维度,也是交流物体与场景信息的主要手段。随着视觉-语言模型(VLM)日益普及,了解它们是否像人类一样命名颜色,对于有效的人机交互至关重要。我们首次对不同 VLM 的颜色命名能力进行系统评估,复现经典颜色命名方法,并在五个代表性模型上使用 957 个颜色样本。结果表明,尽管 VLM 在经典研究中的原型颜色上取得较高准确率,但在扩展的、非原型颜色集合上的性能显著下降。我们识别出在所有模型中一致出现的 21 个常用颜色词,并揭示两种不同方式:受限模型主要使用基本颜色词,而扩展型模型系统地使用明度修饰词。涵盖九种语言的跨语言分析表明,训练存在严重失衡,偏向英语和中文;色相是颜色命名决策的主要驱动因素。最后,消融研究显示,语言模型架构会显著影响颜色命名,且这种影响独立于视觉处理能力。

英文摘要:

Color serves as a fundamental dimension of human visual perception and a primary means of communicating about objects and scenes. As vision-language models (VLMs) become increasingly prevalent, understanding whether they name colors like humans is crucial for effective human-AI interaction. We present the first systematic evaluation of color naming capabilities across VLMs, replicating classic color naming methodologies using 957 color samples across five representative models. Our results show that while VLMs achieve high accuracy on prototypical colors from classical studies, performance drops significantly on expanded, non-prototypical color sets. We identify 21 common color terms that consistently emerge across all models, revealing two distinct approaches: constrained models using predominantly basic terms versus expansive models employing systematic lightness modifiers. Cross-linguistic analysis across nine languages demonstrates severe training imbalances favoring English and Chinese, with hue serving as the primary driver of color naming decisions. Finally, ablation studies reveal that language model architecture significantly influences color naming independent of visual processing capabilities.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑