arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2508.17623cs.CLeess.AS

EMO-Reasoning:口语对话系统中情绪推理能力的基准测试

EMO-Reasoning: Benchmarking Emotional Reasoning Capabilities in Spoken Dialogue Systems

Zhejiang University(浙江大学);UC Berkeley(伯克利大学);National Taiwan University(台湾国立大学);University of Southern California(南加州大学)

Jingwen Liu, Kan Jen Cheng, Jiachen Lian, Akshay Anand, Rishi Jain, Faith Qiao, Robin Netzorg, Huang-Cheng Chou, Tingle Li, Guan-Ting Lin, Gopala Anumanchipalli

AI总结:

针对口语对话系统缺乏情绪推理评估整体系统的问题,本文提出EMO-Reasoning基准与跨轮次情绪推理评分,通过文本转语音生成数据集并评估七个系统,有效检测情绪不一致,推动情绪感知对话建模发展。

摘要:

语音情绪在人机交互中起着关键作用,影响着交互的参与度和情境感知的沟通效果。尽管口语对话系统近年来取得了进展,但仍缺乏一个评估情绪推理的整体系统。为此,我们引入了EMO-Reasoning基准,用于评估对话系统中的情绪连贯性。它利用通过文本转语音生成的精选数据集来模拟多样的情绪状态,克服了情绪语音数据稀缺的问题。我们进一步提出了跨轮次情绪推理评分,以评估多轮对话中的情绪转换。通过连续型、类别型和感知型指标对七个对话系统进行评估,我们证明该框架能有效检测情绪不一致,为改进现有对话系统提供见解。通过发布系统性的评估基准,我们旨在推动情绪感知口语对话建模向更自然、更具适应性的交互发展。

英文摘要:

Speech emotions play a crucial role in human-computer interaction, shaping engagement and context-aware communication. Despite recent advances in spoken dialogue systems, a holistic system for evaluating emotional reasoning is still lacking. To address this, we introduce EMO-Reasoning, a benchmark for assessing emotional coherence in dialogue systems. It leverages a curated dataset generated via text-to-speech to simulate diverse emotional states, overcoming the scarcity of emotional speech data. We further propose the Cross-turn Emotion Reasoning Score to assess the emotion transitions in multi-turn dialogues. Evaluating seven dialogue systems through continuous, categorical, and perceptual metrics, we show that our framework effectively detects emotional inconsistencies, providing insights for improving current dialogue systems. By releasing a systematic evaluation benchmark, we aim to advance emotion-aware spoken dialogue modeling toward more natural and adaptive interactions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑