arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2508.08076cs.DB

实体匹配中的异质性:调查与实验分析

Heterogeneity in Entity Matching: A Survey and Experimental Analysis

Mohammad Hossein Moslemi, Amir Mousavi, Behshid Behkamal, Mostafa Milani

AI总结:

本文调查了实体匹配中的异质性问题,分析了不同异质性类型对匹配任务的影响,并评估了现有方法的局限性,提出了多模态匹配、人机协作等未来研究方向。

摘要:

实体匹配(EM)是数据整合和分析中的基本任务,对于在不同来源中识别指向同一现实实体的记录至关重要。在实践中,数据集在结构、格式、模式和语义上往往差异很大,这给EM带来了重大挑战。我们称这种设置为异质实体匹配(HEM)。本文通过引入一个基于先前工作的分类法,从统一的视角探讨HEM。该分类法区分了两个主要类别——表示异质性和语义异质性——及其子类型。该分类法提供了一个系统化的视角,以理解数据形式和意义的变化如何影响匹配任务的复杂性。然后,我们将此框架与FAIR原则——可发现性、可访问性、互操作性和可重用性——联系起来,展示它们如何揭示HEM的挑战并建议缓解策略。在此基础上,我们批判性地回顾了最近的EM方法,检查它们处理不同异质性类型的的能力,并在最先进的模型上进行有针对性的实验,以评估其在语义异质性下的鲁棒性和适应性。我们的分析揭示了当前方法的持续限制,并指出了未来研究的有前途的方向,包括多模态匹配、人机协作工作流、更深入地与大语言模型和知识图谱集成,以及在异质环境中公平性意识的评估。

英文摘要:

Entity matching (EM) is a fundamental task in data integration and analytics, essential for identifying records that refer to the same real-world entity across diverse sources. In practice, datasets often differ widely in structure, format, schema, and semantics, creating substantial challenges for EM. We refer to this setting as Heterogeneous EM (HEM). This survey offers a unified perspective on HEM by introducing a taxonomy, grounded in prior work, that distinguishes two primary categories -- representation and semantic heterogeneity -- and their subtypes. The taxonomy provides a systematic lens for understanding how variations in data form and meaning shape the complexity of matching tasks. We then connect this framework to the FAIR principles -- Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability -- demonstrating how they both reveal the challenges of HEM and suggest strategies for mitigating them. Building on this foundation, we critically review recent EM methods, examining their ability to address different heterogeneity types, and conduct targeted experiments on state-of-the-art models to evaluate their robustness and adaptability under semantic heterogeneity. Our analysis uncovers persistent limitations in current approaches and points to promising directions for future research, including multimodal matching, human-in-the-loop workflows, deeper integration with large language models and knowledge graphs, and fairness-aware evaluation in heterogeneous settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑