arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2507.22947cs.CYcs.CLcs.LG

ELMES:一种用于教育场景下大语言模型评估的自动化框架

ELMES: An Automated Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Educational Scenarios

Shanghai Innavation Institute(上海创新研究院);Shanghai Institute of AI for Education(上海人工智能教育研究院);Department of Educational Information Technology(教育信息技术系);School of Computer Science and Technology(计算机科学与技术学院)

Shou'ang Wei, Xinyun Wang, Shuzhen Bi, Jian Chen, Ruijia Li, Bo Jiang, Xin Lin, Min Zhang, Yu Song, BingDong Li, Aimin Zhou, Hao Hao

AI总结:

针对教育场景下LLM评估指标不统一、现有基准侧重通用智能的问题,研究人员提出开源自动化评估框架ELMES,支持多场景灵活配置与混合评估,经多场景基准测试验证可有效衡量模型教学能力,降低教育应用适配门槛。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLM)的出现为教育领域带来了变革性机遇,催生了大量新型应用场景。但目前仍存在显著挑战:不同教育场景的评估指标差异极大,且许多新兴场景缺乏合适的评估指标。现有基准主要衡量通用智能而非教学能力。为填补这一空白,我们提出ELMES——一款专门用于评估教育场景下LLM的开源自动化评估框架。ELMES采用模块化架构,研究人员仅需通过简单的配置文件即可创建动态多智能体对话,无需丰富的编程经验就能灵活设计场景。该框架集成了混合评估引擎,采用LLM-as-a-Judge(大语言模型作为评审)方法,对传统上主观的教学指标进行客观量化。我们联合教育专家制定了细粒度指标,在四个关键教育场景下对当前最先进的LLM开展了系统性基准测试,这四个场景分别是:知识点讲解、引导式解题教学、跨学科教案生成、情境化问题生成。结果显示不同模型的能力分布存在明显差异,揭示了它们在特定场景下的优势与局限。ELMES为教育工作者和研究人员提供了一个易用的评估框架,大幅降低了各类教育应用的适配门槛,同时推动了LLM在教学中的实际落地。该框架已公开发布于https://github.com/sii-research/elmes.git。

英文摘要:

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents transformative opportunities for education, generating numerous novel application scenarios. However, significant challenges remain: evaluation metrics vary substantially across different educational scenarios, while many emerging scenarios lack appropriate assessment metrics. Current benchmarks predominantly measure general intelligence rather than pedagogical capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce ELMES, an open-source automated evaluation framework specifically designed for assessing LLMs in educational settings. ELMES features a modular architecture that enables researchers to create dynamic, multi-agent dialogues through simple configuration files, facilitating flexible scenario design without requiring extensive programming expertise. The framework incorporates a hybrid evaluation engine that objectively quantifies traditionally subjective pedagogical metrics using an LLM-as-a-Judge methodology. We conduct systematic benchmarking of state-of-the-art LLMs across four critical educational scenarios: Knowledge Point Explanation, Guided Problem-Solving Teaching, Interdisciplinary Lesson Plan Generation, and Contextualized Question Generation, employing fine-grained metrics developed in collaboration with education specialists. Our results demonstrate distinct capability distributions among models, revealing context-specific strengths and limitations. ELMES provides educators and researchers with an accessible evaluation framework that significantly reduces adaptation barriers for diverse educational applications while advancing the practical implementation of LLMs in pedagogy. The framework is publicly available at \emph{https://github.com/sii-research/elmes.git}.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑