arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2507.22074cs.LGcs.CL

CIMR:面向大视觉语言模型鲁棒指令遵循的上下文感知迭代多模态推理

CIMR: Contextualized Iterative Multimodal Reasoning for Robust Instruction Following in LVLMs

Singapore Institute of Management(新加坡管理学院)

Yangshu Yuan, Heng Chen, Xinyi Jiang, Christian Ng, Kexin Qiu

AI总结:

针对大视觉语言模型难处理复杂多步多模态指令的问题,提出带上下文感知迭代推理与自校正模块的CIMR框架,在新MAP数据集上准确率达91.5%,优于多款主流模型。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLM)和大视觉语言模型(LVLM)的快速发展提升了我们处理与生成人类语言及视觉信息的能力。然而,这类模型往往难以应对需要逻辑推理、动态反馈整合与迭代自校正的复杂多步多模态指令。为解决该问题,我们提出CIMR(上下文感知迭代多模态推理)——一种引入上下文感知迭代推理与自校正模块的新型框架。CIMR分为两个阶段运行:首先是初始推理与响应生成,随后利用解析后的多模态反馈进行迭代优化。动态融合模块会在每一步深度整合文本、视觉与上下文特征。我们在Visual Instruction Tuning(VIT,视觉指令调优)数据集上微调LLaVA-1.5-7B,并在新提出的Multi-modal Action Planning(MAP,多模态动作规划)数据集上评估CIMR。CIMR的准确率达到91.5%,优于GPT-4V(89.2%)、LLaVA-1.5(78.5%)、MiniGPT-4(75.3%)与InstructBLIP(72.8%)等当前最优模型,证明了其迭代推理与自校正能力在复杂任务中的有效性。

英文摘要:

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has enhanced our ability to process and generate human language and visual information. However, these models often struggle with complex, multi-step multi-modal instructions that require logical reasoning, dynamic feedback integration, and iterative self-correction. To address this, we propose CIMR: Contextualized Iterative Multimodal Reasoning, a novel framework that introduces a context-aware iterative reasoning and self-correction module. CIMR operates in two stages: initial reasoning and response generation, followed by iterative refinement using parsed multi-modal feedback. A dynamic fusion module deeply integrates textual, visual, and contextual features at each step. We fine-tune LLaVA-1.5-7B on the Visual Instruction Tuning (VIT) dataset and evaluate CIMR on the newly introduced Multi-modal Action Planning (MAP) dataset. CIMR achieves 91.5% accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art models such as GPT-4V (89.2%), LLaVA-1.5 (78.5%), MiniGPT-4 (75.3%), and InstructBLIP (72.8%), demonstrating the efficacy of its iterative reasoning and self-correction capabilities in complex tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑