arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2507.18512cs.CVcs.AI

解释视觉、文本和多模态编码器如何共享概念

Explaining How Visual, Textual and Multimodal Encoders Share Concepts

Université Paris-Saclay(巴黎萨克雷大学);CEA, List(法国原子能委员会 LIST实验室)

Clément Cornet, Romaric Besançon, Hervé Le Borgne

AI总结:

提出跨 SAE 特征比较模型及量化单特征比较共享度的新指标,对 21 个视觉、文本和多模态编码器进行分析,揭示 VLM 特有视觉特征与文本编码器的共享现象。

摘要:

稀疏自编码器(SAE)已成为从神经网络激活中提取人类可解释特征的强大技术。以往工作基于 SAE 衍生特征比较不同模型,但这些比较仅限于同一模态内的模型。我们提出一种新的指标,可跨 SAE 特征对模型进行定量比较,并用其对视觉、文本和多模态编码器开展比较研究。我们还提出量化不同类别模型之间单个特征的比较共享度。借助这两个新工具,我们对三种类型的 21 个编码器进行了多项研究,涵盖两种显著不同的规模,并考虑通用数据集和特定领域数据集。结果使我们能够结合在多模态环境中训练的编码器重新审视以往研究,并量化所有这些模型在多大程度上共享某些表征或特征。结果还表明,在视觉编码器中为 VLM 所特有的视觉特征会与文本编码器共享,这突显了文本预训练的影响。代码可在 https://github.com/CEA-LIST/SAEshareConcepts 获取。

英文摘要:

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful technique for extracting human-interpretable features from neural networks activations. Previous works compared different models based on SAE-derived features but those comparisons have been restricted to models within the same modality. We propose a novel indicator allowing quantitative comparison of models across SAE features, and use it to conduct a comparative study of visual, textual and multimodal encoders. We also propose to quantify the Comparative Sharedness of individual features between different classes of models. With these two new tools, we conduct several studies on 21 encoders of the three types, with two significantly different sizes, and considering generalist and domain specific datasets. The results allow to revisit previous studies at the light of encoders trained in a multimodal context and to quantify to which extent all these models share some representations or features. They also suggest that visual features that are specific to VLMs among vision encoders are shared with text encoders, highlighting the impact of text pretraining. The code is available at https://github.com/CEA-LIST/SAEshareConcepts

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑