arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2507.17316stat.MLcs.LG

近似最小最大离散分布估计在Kullback-Leibler散度中的高概率性

Nearly Minimax Discrete Distribution Estimation in Kullback-Leibler Divergence with High Probability

Leiden University(莱顿大学);TU Delft(代尔夫特理工大学);University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学)

Dirk van der Hoeven, Julia Olkhovskaia, Tim van Erven

AI总结:

本文研究了在Kullback-Leibler散度中以高概率估计离散分布的最小最大速率,发现其速率受双对数因子影响,且比总变差和Hellinger距离更难估计。

摘要:

我们考虑在Kullback-Leibler散度中以高概率估计一个大小为K的离散分布的基本问题。我们提供了上界和下界,表明最优速率在(K + ln(K)ln(1/δ))/n和(K ln ln(K) + ln(K)ln(1/δ))/n之间,误差概率为δ,样本量为n,其中K乘以双对数因子ln ln K。我们的上界使用在线学习技术来构造一个新型估计器,通过在线到批量转换。也许令人惊讶的是,最小最大速率的尾部行为比平方总变差和平方Hellinger距离更差,后者为(K + ln(1/δ))/n,即没有乘以ln K的ln(1/δ)。因此,我们无法从通常的减少到这些较小距离的方法中获得完全紧的下界。此外,我们显示这个下界无法通过基于假设检验的常规下界方法实现,而需要引入一个新的减少到我们称之为弱假设检验的方法。我们进一步在细化的结果中研究与其他散度的差距来源,显示总变差速率对于Kullback-Leibler散度来说是可行的(实际上通过最大似然估计器)如果排除概率小于O(ln(K/δ)/n)的结局,这在n增加时是一个消失集。这解释了为什么最小最大Kullback-Leibler估计比渐近估计更困难。

英文摘要:

We consider the fundamental problem of estimating a discrete distribution on a domain of size $K$ with high probability in Kullback-Leibler divergence. We provide upper and lower bounds on the minimax estimation rate, which show that the optimal rate is between $\big(K + \ln(K)\ln(1/δ)\big) /n$ and $\big(K\ln\ln(K) + \ln(K)\ln(1/δ)\big) /n$ at error probability $δ$ and sample size $n$, which pins down the rate up to the doubly logarithmic factor $\ln \ln K$ that multiplies $K$. Our upper bound uses techniques from online learning to construct a novel estimator via online-to-batch conversion. Perhaps surprisingly, the tail behavior of the minimax rate is worse than for the squared total variation and squared Hellinger distance, for which it is $\big(K + \ln(1/δ)\big) /n$, i.e. without the $\ln K$ multiplying $\ln (1/δ)$. As a consequence, we cannot obtain a fully tight lower bound from the usual reduction to these smaller distances. Moreover, we show that this lower bound cannot be achieved by the standard lower bound approach based on a reduction to hypothesis testing, and instead we need to introduce a new reduction to what we call weak hypothesis testing. We investigate the source of the gap with other divergences further in refined results, which show that the total variation rate is achievable for Kullback-Leibler divergence after all (in fact by he maximum likelihood estimator) if we rule out outcome probabilities smaller than $O(\ln(K/δ) / n)$, which is a vanishing set as $n$ increases for fixed $K$ and $δ$. This explains why minimax Kullback-Leibler estimation is more difficult than asymptotic estimation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑