ViewSRD:通过结构化多视图分解实现3D视觉定位
ViewSRD: 3D Visual Grounding via Structured Multi-View Decomposition
AI总结:
本文提出ViewSRD框架,通过结构化多视图分解、跨视图文本-场景交互与推理,解决复杂多锚点查询中的目标解耦及视角不一致问题。
摘要:
3D视觉定位旨在根据文本描述在3D空间中识别并定位物体。然而,现有方法在复杂的多锚点查询中难以将目标与锚点解耦,也难以解决由视角变化引起的空间描述不一致问题。为应对这些挑战,我们提出ViewSRD,该框架将3D视觉定位表述为结构化多视图分解过程。首先,Simple Relation Decoupling(SRD,简单关系解耦)模块将复杂的多锚点查询重构为一组有针对性的单锚点陈述,生成一组结构化的视角感知描述,以明确位置关系。这些分解后的表示作为Multi-view Textual-Scene Interaction(Multi-TSI,多视图文本-场景交互)模块的基础,该模块使用共享的Cross-modal Consistent View Tokens(CCVT,跨模态一致视图令牌)跨多个视角整合文本与场景特征,以保留空间相关性。最后,Textual-Scene Reasoning(文本-场景推理)模块将多视图预测合成为统一且鲁棒的3D视觉定位结果。在3D视觉定位数据集上的实验表明,ViewSRD显著优于最先进方法,尤其是在需要精确空间区分的复杂查询中。代码位于https://github.com/visualjason/ViewSRD。
英文摘要:
3D visual grounding aims to identify and localize objects in a 3D space based on textual descriptions. However, existing methods struggle with disentangling targets from anchors in complex multi-anchor queries and resolving inconsistencies in spatial descriptions caused by perspective variations. To tackle these challenges, we propose ViewSRD, a framework that formulates 3D visual grounding as a structured multi-view decomposition process. First, the Simple Relation Decoupling (SRD) module restructures complex multi-anchor queries into a set of targeted single-anchor statements, generating a structured set of perspective-aware descriptions that clarify positional relationships. These decomposed representations serve as the foundation for the Multi-view Textual-Scene Interaction (Multi-TSI) module, which integrates textual and scene features across multiple viewpoints using shared, Cross-modal Consistent View Tokens (CCVTs) to preserve spatial correlations. Finally, a Textual-Scene Reasoning module synthesizes multi-view predictions into a unified and robust 3D visual grounding. Experiments on 3D visual grounding datasets show that ViewSRD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, particularly in complex queries requiring precise spatial differentiation. Code is available at https://github.com/visualjason/ViewSRD.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。