arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2506.23563cs.AIcs.CLcs.CV

MMReason:面向AGI的MLLM开放式多模态多步推理基准

MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI

Nanyang Technological University(南洋理工大学);Tsinghua University(清华大学);Baidu Inc.(百度公司);University of California(加州大学);University of Science and Technology of China(中国科学技术大学)

Huanjin Yao, Jiaxing Huang, Yawen Qiu, Michael K. Chen, Wenzheng Liu, Wei Zhang, Wenjie Zeng, Xikun Zhang, Jingyi Zhang, Yuxin Song, Wenhao Wu, Dacheng Tao

AI总结:

针对现有基准在评估长链推理方面的不足,本文提出MMReason基准,通过多领域多难度的开放式问题、多模型投票过滤及三元评分机制,全面精确评估多模态大语言模型的多步推理能力。

摘要:

推理在推动多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)迈向通用人工智能(AGI)方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,现有的MLLM基准在精确且全面地评估长链推理能力方面,往往在以下三个关键方面存在不足:(1)缺乏难度和多样性;(2)易受猜测和记忆的影响;(3)对中间推理步骤的评估不够充分。为了填补这一空白,我们引入了MMReason,这是一个旨在通过多样化、开放式、具有挑战性的问题来精确且全面评估MLLM长链推理能力的新基准。首先,我们从多个领域(即6个学科)和多个难度级别(即从大学前到大学,从基础到竞赛级别)中筛选出需要多步推理的挑战性问题。其次,我们将这些问题重新表述为开放式格式,并使用多模型投票技术进行过滤,以消除与猜测和记忆相关的捷径情况,从而确保稳健的推理评估。第三,我们为问题标注了详细的逐步解答,并设计了一种基于参考的三元评分机制,以可靠地评估中间推理步骤。借助MMReason,我们对流行的领先MLLMs进行了基准测试,并对其推理能力进行了深入分析。我们希望MMReason能成为推进MLLM推理研究的宝贵资源。代码将在 https://github.com/HJYao00/MMReason 上提供。

英文摘要:

Reasoning plays a crucial role in advancing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) toward Artificial General Intelligence. However, existing MLLM benchmarks often fall short in precisely and comprehensively evaluating long-chain reasoning abilities from three key aspects: (1) lack of difficulty and diversity, (2) susceptibility to guessability and memorization, (3) inadequate assessment of intermediate reasoning steps. To fill this gap, we introduce MMReason, a new benchmark designed to precisely and comprehensively evaluate MLLM long-chain reasoning capability with diverse, open-ended, challenging questions. First, we curate challenging questions requiring multi-step reasoning from various fields (i.e., 6 disciplines) and multiple difficulty levels (i.e., from pre-university to university, and from foundational to competition tiers). Second, these questions are reformulated into an open-ended format and filtered using a multi-model voting technique to eliminate shortcut cases related to guessing and memorization, ensuring robust reasoning evaluations. Third, we annotate the questions with detailed step-by-step solutions, and design a reference-based ternary scoring mechanism to reliably assess intermediate reasoning steps. With MMReason, we benchmark popular leading MLLMs and provide an in-depth analysis of their reasoning capabilities. We hope MMReason will serve as a valuable resource for advancing MLLM reasoning research. Code will be available at https://github.com/HJYao00/MMReason.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑