arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2506.21285cs.CL

Double-Checker:通过自我批评微调提升慢思考大语言模型的推理能力

Double-Checker: Enhancing Reasoning of Slow-Thinking LLMs via Self-Critical Fine-Tuning

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科学与技术大学);University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(电子科技大学);Dalian University of Technology(大连理工大学);University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校);Zhejiang University(浙江大学);University of Oxford(牛津大学);NVIDIA(NVIDIA公司);University of Surrey(萨里大学)

Xin Xu, Tianhao Chen, Fan Zhang, Wanlong Liu, Pengxiang Li, Ajay Kumar Jaiswal, Yuchen Yan, Jishan Hu, Yang Wang, Hao Chen, Shiwei Liu, Shizhe Diao, Can Yang, Lu Yin

AI总结:

针对慢思考大语言模型自我批评与方案优化能力不足的问题,提出Double-Checker框架,通过1730个实例微调实现迭代式自我批评优化,在AIME基准上将pass@1从4.4%提升至18.2%。

摘要:

尽管慢思考大语言模型(LLMs)展现出类似反思的推理能力(通常被称为“顿悟时刻”),但其生成有价值的批评并优化先前解决方案的能力仍然有限。本文提出了Double-Checker,这是一个系统性框架,旨在通过促进慢思考LLMs对其先前解决方案进行明确的自我批评和迭代优化,提升其推理能力。通过在我们精心整理的1730个自我批评实例上进行微调,Double-Checker使长思维链(CoT)LLMs能够在推理过程中迭代地批评和优化其输出,直到在自身生成的批评下判定解决方案正确为止。我们在一套全面的推理基准上验证了Double-Checker的有效性,证明迭代式自我批评显著提升了长CoT LLMs的推理能力。值得注意的是,与原始长CoT LLMs相比,我们的Double-Checker将具有挑战性的AIME基准上的pass@1性能从4.4%提升至18.2%。这些结果为开发更可靠、更有效且具备结构化自我批评能力的LLMs指明了一个有前景的方向。我们的代码和数据可在https://github.com/XinXU-USTC/DoubleChecker获取。

英文摘要:

While slow-thinking large language models (LLMs) exhibit reflection-like reasoning, commonly referred to as the "aha moment:, their ability to generate informative critiques and refine prior solutions remains limited. In this paper, we introduce Double-Checker, a principled framework designed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of slow-thinking LLMs by fostering explicit self-critique and iterative refinement of their previous solutions. By fine-tuning on our curated 1,730 self-critical instances, Double-Checker empowers long-CoT LLMs to iteratively critique and refine their outputs during inference until they evaluate their solutions as correct under self-generated critiques. We validate the efficacy of Double-Checker across a comprehensive suite of reasoning benchmarks, demonstrating that iterative self-critique significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of long-CoT LLMs. Notably, our Double-Checker increases the pass@1 performance on challenging AIME benchmarks from 4.4% to 18.2% compared to the original long-CoT LLMs. These results highlight a promising direction for developing more trustworthy and effective LLMs capable of structured self-critique. Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/XinXU-USTC/DoubleChecker

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑