arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2506.11172cs.LGcs.AI

离线强化学习中通过投毒攻击破坏序列级数据-策略覆盖度

Collapsing Sequence-Level Data-Policy Coverage via Poisoning Attack in Offline Reinforcement Learning

College of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University(计算机科学与技术学院,哈尔滨工程大学)

Xue Zhou, Dapeng Man, Chen Xu, Fanyi Zeng, Tao Liu, Huan Wang, Shucheng He, Chaoyang Gao, Wu Yang

AI总结:

针对离线强化学习现有研究忽略覆盖不足安全风险、单步分析不符多步决策本质的问题,提出序列级可集中系数量化覆盖度,设计CSDPC投毒攻击,仅投毒1%数据即可使智能体性能降90%,为离线RL安全研究提供新视角。

摘要:

离线强化学习(RL)高度依赖预收集数据对目标策略分布的覆盖度。现有研究旨在提升数据-策略覆盖度以缓解分布偏移,却忽略了覆盖不足带来的安全风险,且单步分析与离线RL的多步决策本质不符。为解决该问题,我们引入序列级可集中系数来量化覆盖度,并通过理论分析揭示其对估计误差上界的指数放大效应。在此基础上,我们提出Collapsing Sequence-Level Data-Policy Coverage(CSDPC,破坏序列级数据-策略覆盖度)投毒攻击。考虑到离线RL数据的连续性,我们将状态-动作对转化为决策单元,并提取能捕捉多步行为的代表性决策模式。我们识别出可能导致覆盖不足的罕见模式,并对其投毒以降低覆盖度、加剧分布偏移。实验表明,仅投毒1%的数据集就能使智能体性能下降90%。该发现为分析和保障离线RL的安全性提供了新视角。

英文摘要:

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) heavily relies on the coverage of pre-collected data over the target policy's distribution. Existing studies aim to improve data-policy coverage to mitigate distributional shifts, but overlook security risks from insufficient coverage, and the single-step analysis is not consistent with the multi-step decision-making nature of offline RL. To address this, we introduce the sequence-level concentrability coefficient to quantify coverage, and reveal its exponential amplification on the upper bound of estimation errors through theoretical analysis. Building on this, we propose the Collapsing Sequence-Level Data-Policy Coverage (CSDPC) poisoning attack. Considering the continuous nature of offline RL data, we convert state-action pairs into decision units, and extract representative decision patterns that capture multi-step behavior. We identify rare patterns likely to cause insufficient coverage, and poison them to reduce coverage and exacerbate distributional shifts. Experiments show that poisoning just 1% of the dataset can degrade agent performance by 90%. This finding provides new perspectives for analyzing and safeguarding the security of offline RL.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑