arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2506.04253cs.AIcs.HC

HADA:人机智能体决策对齐架构

HADA: Human-AI Agent Decision Alignment Architecture

Department of Computer Science and Engineering(计算机科学与工程系);Aalto University(阿尔托大学);Department of Industrial Engineering and Management(工业工程与管理系)

Tapio Pitkäranta, Leena Pitkäranta

AI总结:

HADA 提出一种与协议和框架无关的人机智能体决策对齐架构,通过角色化利益相关方智能体实现对话式查询、引导、审计与质疑,并在信用评分场景中验证其能提升决策准确性、透明度和伦理合规性。

摘要:

我们提出 HADA(Human-AI Agent Decision Alignment,人机智能体决策对齐),这是一种与协议和框架无关的参考架构,能够使大型语言模型(LLM)智能体和传统算法始终与组织目标和价值观保持一致。HADA 将任意算法或 LLM 封装在角色特定的利益相关方智能体中——包括业务、数据科学、审计、伦理和客户——每个智能体都暴露对话式 API,使技术和非技术参与者能够在战略、战术和实时时间尺度上查询、引导、审计或质疑每一项决策。对齐目标、KPI 和价值约束以自然语言表达,并在数千个异构智能体运行于不同编排栈上时持续传播、记录和版本化。一个云原生概念验证打包了一个生产级信用评分模型(getLoanDecision),并将其部署在 Docker/Kubernetes/Python 上;五个脚本化的零售银行场景展示了目标变更、参数调整、解释请求和伦理触发器如何端到端地流经该架构。评估遵循设计科学研究方法论(Design-Science Research Methodology)。走查观察和日志检查证明了对六个预定义目标的完整覆盖:每个角色都能调用对话式控制、追踪 KPI 和价值约束、检测并缓解邮政编码偏差,并复现完整的决策谱系,且不依赖于底层 LLM 或智能体库。贡献包括:(1)一个开源的 HADA 架构,(2)一个面向多智能体系统中人机对齐的中程设计理论,以及(3)实证证据表明,与框架无关、符合协议的利益相关方智能体能够提升现实世界决策流水线中的准确性、透明度和伦理合规性。

英文摘要:

We present HADA (Human-AI Agent Decision Alignment), a protocol- and framework agnostic reference architecture that keeps both large language model (LLM) agents and legacy algorithms aligned with organizational targets and values. HADA wraps any algorithm or LLM in role-specific stakeholder agents -- business, data-science, audit, ethics, and customer -- each exposing conversational APIs so that technical and non-technical actors can query, steer, audit, or contest every decision across strategic, tactical, and real-time horizons. Alignment objectives, KPIs, and value constraints are expressed in natural language and are continuously propagated, logged, and versioned while thousands of heterogeneous agents run on different orchestration stacks. A cloud-native proof of concept packages a production credit-scoring model (getLoanDecision) and deploys it on Docker/Kubernetes/Python; five scripted retail-bank scenarios show how target changes, parameter tweaks, explanation requests, and ethics triggers flow end to end through the architecture. Evaluation followed the Design-Science Research Methodology. Walkthrough observation and log inspection demonstrated complete coverage of six predefined objectives: every role could invoke conversational control, trace KPIs and value constraints, detect and mitigate ZIP-code bias, and reproduce full decision lineage, independent of the underlying LLM or agent library. Contributions: (1) an open-source HADA architecture, (2) a mid-range design theory for human-AI alignment in multi-agent systems, and (3) empirical evidence that framework-agnostic, protocol-compliant stakeholder agents improve accuracy, transparency, and ethical compliance in real-world decision pipelines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑