arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2506.04063cs.HCcs.DCcs.LG

Crowd-SFT:面向大语言模型对齐的众包方法

Crowd-SFT: Crowdsourcing for LLM Alignment

University of Southern California(南加州大学);Loyola Marymount University(洛约拉马利蒙特大学)

Alex Sotiropoulos, Sulyab Thottungal Valapu, Linus Lei, Jared Coleman, Bhaskar Krishnamachari

AI总结:

本文提出开放众包微调框架Crowd-SFT,通过基于Shapley值的积分奖励机制和迭代多模型选择,在降低对齐偏差与成本的同时实现公平可扩展的LLM对齐。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)越来越依赖监督微调(SFT)和基于人类反馈的强化学习(RLHF)来使模型响应与人类偏好对齐。RLHF采用强化学习方法并配合独立的奖励模型,而SFT则使用人工整理的数据集进行监督学习。这两种方法传统上都依赖规模较小且经过审核的标注者群体,因而成本高昂、容易产生偏差,且可扩展性受限。我们提出一个开放的众包微调框架,通过支持在不进行大规模标注者培训的情况下为SFT收集更广泛的反馈来解决这些局限。该框架通过一个与Shapley值相关联的积分奖励机制促进激励公平,并通过迭代模型更新引导模型收敛。我们的多模型选择框架相比单模型选择在目标距离上最多实现55%的降低,使后续实验得以验证我们的积分奖励机制与Shapley值(一种公认的用于归因个体贡献的方法)高度一致,从而支持公平且可扩展的参与。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to align model responses with human preferences. While RLHF employs a reinforcement learning approach with a separate reward model, SFT uses human-curated datasets for supervised learning. Both approaches traditionally depend on small, vetted groups of annotators, making them costly, prone to bias, and limited in scalability. We propose an open, crowd-sourced fine-tuning framework that addresses these limitations by enabling broader feedback collection for SFT without extensive annotator training. Our framework promotes incentive fairness via a point-based reward system correlated with Shapley values and guides model convergence through iterative model updates. Our multi-model selection framework demonstrates up to a 55% reduction in target distance over single-model selection, enabling subsequent experiments that validate our point-based reward mechanism's close alignment with Shapley values (a well-established method for attributing individual contributions) thereby supporting fair and scalable participation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑