arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2506.00549cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

面向跨领域跨语言的大语言模型摘要生成多维度评估

Towards Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM Summarization across Domains and Languages

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology(韩国先进科学研究院);AWS AI Labs(AWS人工智能实验室)

Hyangsuk Min, Yuho Lee, Minjeong Ban, Jiaqi Deng, Nicole Hee-Yeon Kim, Taewon Yun, Hang Su, Jason Cai, Hwanjun Song

AI总结:

针对现有摘要评估基准缺领域标准、偏英语、标注难的问题,研究提出多领域多语言的MSumBench评估基准,采用多智能体辩论优化标注,评估8个模型后发现跨领域语言的性能差异,并揭示大模型自评摘要的系统性偏差。

摘要:

文本摘要的评估框架在领域覆盖度和评估指标方面均已取得发展。然而,现有基准仍缺乏针对特定领域的评估标准,整体仍以英语为核心,且因推理复杂度较高,人工标注工作面临诸多挑战。为解决这些问题,我们提出MSumBench(多维度摘要基准),可实现中英文摘要的多维度、多领域评估,还为每个领域设置了专门的评估标准,并采用多智能体辩论系统提升标注质量。通过对8个现代摘要模型的评估,我们发现不同领域和语言下的模型表现呈现出差异化模式。我们进一步将大语言模型作为摘要评估器展开研究,分析其评估能力与摘要生成能力之间的相关性,同时发现其在评估自身生成的摘要时存在系统性偏差。我们的基准数据集已在https://github.com/DISL-Lab/MSumBench 公开。

英文摘要:

Evaluation frameworks for text summarization have evolved in terms of both domain coverage and metrics. However, existing benchmarks still lack domain-specific assessment criteria, remain predominantly English-centric, and face challenges with human annotation due to the complexity of reasoning. To address these, we introduce MSumBench, which provides a multi-dimensional, multi-domain evaluation of summarization in English and Chinese. It also incorporates specialized assessment criteria for each domain and leverages a multi-agent debate system to enhance annotation quality. By evaluating eight modern summarization models, we discover distinct performance patterns across domains and languages. We further examine large language models as summary evaluators, analyzing the correlation between their evaluation and summarization capabilities, and uncovering systematic bias in their assessment of self-generated summaries. Our benchmark dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/DISL-Lab/MSumBench.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑