arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2505.12349cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
收藏

来自多样性的智慧:通过人类-大语言模型混合众包群体缓解偏差

Wisdom from Diversity: Bias Mitigation Through Hybrid Human-LLM Crowds

Machine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles(布鲁塞尔自由大学机器学习组);AI Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel(布鲁塞尔自由大学人工智能实验室);FARI, AI for the Common-Good Institute, ULB-VUB(ULB-VUB共同利益人工智能研究所);Center for Human-Compatible AI, UC Berkeley(伯克利人类兼容人工智能中心)

Axel Abels, Tom Lenaerts

AI总结:

针对大语言模型易延续训练数据偏差的问题,研究发现单纯多模型平均会加剧偏差,而局部加权聚合可缓解偏差并提升准确率,结合人类与LLM的混合众包群体能进一步优化性能、降低种族和性别相关偏差。

摘要:

尽管大语言模型(LLM)性能优异,但它们可能会无意中延续其训练数据中存在的偏差。通过分析LLM对引发偏差的新闻标题的回复,我们发现这些模型往往会反映人类的偏差。为解决这一问题,我们探索了基于众包的策略,通过回复聚合来缓解偏差。我们首先证明,单纯平均多个LLM的回复(本意是利用“群体智慧”),由于LLM群体内部多样性有限,反而可能加剧现有偏差。相比之下,我们发现局部加权聚合方法能更有效地利用LLM群体的智慧,既缓解了偏差,又提高了准确率。最后,鉴于LLM(准确率)和人类(多样性)的互补优势,我们证明包含二者的混合众包群体能显著提升性能,并在种族和性别相关场景中进一步降低偏差。

英文摘要:

Despite their performance, large language models (LLMs) can inadvertently perpetuate biases found in the data they are trained on. By analyzing LLM responses to bias-eliciting headlines, we find that these models often mirror human biases. To address this, we explore crowd-based strategies for mitigating bias through response aggregation. We first demonstrate that simply averaging responses from multiple LLMs, intended to leverage the "wisdom of the crowd", can exacerbate existing biases due to the limited diversity within LLM crowds. In contrast, we show that locally weighted aggregation methods more effectively leverage the wisdom of the LLM crowd, achieving both bias mitigation and improved accuracy. Finally, recognizing the complementary strengths of LLMs (accuracy) and humans (diversity), we demonstrate that hybrid crowds containing both significantly enhance performance and further reduce biases across ethnic and gender-related contexts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑