arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2505.10664cs.CVcs.AI

CLIP嵌入用于AI生成图像检测:轻量级分类器的少样本研究

CLIP Embeddings for AI-Generated Image Detection: A Few-Shot Study with Lightweight Classifier

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering(电气与计算机工程系);University of Rochester(罗切斯特大学)

Ziyang Ou

AI总结:

本研究利用冻结的CLIP嵌入配合轻量级分类器,在少样本条件下检测AI生成图像,在CIFAKE上达到95%准确率,并发现广角照片和油画等类型分类困难。

摘要:

如今,在社交媒体平台上验证AI生成图像的真实性日益成为一项挑战。尽管像CLIP这样的视觉-语言模型(VLM)在多模态表示方面表现出色,但由于预训练过程中缺乏此类标签,其用于AI生成图像分类的能力尚未得到充分探索。本研究探讨CLIP嵌入是否固有地包含指示AI生成的信息。所提出的流程使用冻结的CLIP模型提取视觉嵌入,将其嵌入输入轻量级网络,并仅微调最终分类器。在公开的CIFAKE基准上的实验表明,在无需语言推理的情况下,性能达到95%的准确率。对使用20%数据的定制数据集进行少样本适应后,性能达到85%。一个闭源基线(Gemini-2.0)具有最佳的零样本准确率,但在特定风格上失败。值得注意的是,某些特定图像类型,如广角照片和油画,对分类构成重大挑战。这些结果表明,在分类某些类型的AI生成图像时存在先前未探索的困难,揭示了该领域中值得进一步研究的新且更具体的问题。

英文摘要:

Verifying the authenticity of AI-generated images presents a growing challenge on social media platforms these days. While vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP outdo in multimodal representation, their capacity for AI-generated image classification is underexplored due to the absence of such labels during the pre-training process. This work investigates whether CLIP embeddings inherently contain information indicative of AI generation. A proposed pipeline extracts visual embeddings using a frozen CLIP model, feeds its embeddings to lightweight networks, and fine-tunes only the final classifier. Experiments on the public CIFAKE benchmark show the performance reaches 95% accuracy without language reasoning. Few-shot adaptation to curated custom with 20% of the data results in performance to 85%. A closed-source baseline (Gemini-2.0) has the best zero-shot accuracy yet fails on specific styles. Notably, some specific image types, such as wide-angle photographs and oil paintings, pose significant challenges to classification. These results indicate previously unexplored difficulties in classifying certain types of AI-generated images, revealing new and more specific questions in this domain that are worth further investigation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑