arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2504.13143cs.CVcs.AI

$\texttt{Complex-Edit}$: 用于复杂度可控图像编辑基准的类CoT指令生成

$\texttt{Complex-Edit}$: CoT-Like Instruction Generation for Complexity-Controllable Image Editing Benchmark

University of California, Santa Cruz(加州大学圣克鲁兹分校);University of Edinburgh(爱丁堡大学);Google(谷歌)

Siwei Yang, Mude Hui, Bingchen Zhao, Yuyin Zhou, Nataniel Ruiz, Cihang Xie

AI总结:

该研究提出$\texttt{Complex-Edit}$基准,通过Chain-of-Edit流程生成不同复杂度的图像编辑指令,结合VLM自动评估,揭示开源与闭源模型性能差距等关键发现,助力可控复杂度图像编辑模型评估。

摘要:

我们引入$\texttt{Complex-Edit}$,这是一个全面的基准,旨在系统评估基于指令的图像编辑模型在不同复杂度指令下的性能。为开发该基准,我们利用GPT-4o自动大规模收集多样化的编辑指令。我们的方法遵循结构化的“Chain-of-Edit”流程:首先独立生成单个原子编辑任务,再将其整合为连贯的复杂指令。此外,我们引入一套评估编辑性能各方面的指标,以及支持大规模评估的基于VLM的自动评估流程。该基准得出多项重要见解:1)开源模型显著落后于专有闭源模型,且指令复杂度增加时性能差距扩大;2)指令复杂度提升主要损害模型保留输入图像关键元素和整体美学质量的能力;3)将复杂指令分解为原子步骤序列并逐步执行,会大幅降低多指标下的性能;4)简单的Best-of-N选择策略可改善直接编辑和分步方法的结果;5)观察到“合成数据诅咒”:模型训练涉及合成数据时,编辑指令复杂度升高会使编辑图像更趋合成感,这一现象也出现在最新GPT-4o输出中。

英文摘要:

We introduce $\texttt{Complex-Edit}$, a comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate instruction-based image editing models across instructions of varying complexity. To develop this benchmark, we harness GPT-4o to automatically collect a diverse set of editing instructions at scale. Our approach follows a well-structured ``Chain-of-Edit'' pipeline: we first generate individual atomic editing tasks independently and then integrate them to form cohesive, complex instructions. Additionally, we introduce a suite of metrics to assess various aspects of editing performance, along with a VLM-based auto-evaluation pipeline that supports large-scale assessments. Our benchmark yields several notable insights: 1) Open-source models significantly underperform relative to proprietary, closed-source models, with the performance gap widening as instruction complexity increases; 2) Increased instructional complexity primarily impairs the models' ability to retain key elements from the input images and to preserve the overall aesthetic quality; 3) Decomposing a complex instruction into a sequence of atomic steps, executed in a step-by-step manner, substantially degrades performance across multiple metrics; 4) A straightforward Best-of-N selection strategy improves results for both direct editing and the step-by-step sequential approach; and 5) We observe a ``curse of synthetic data'': when synthetic data is involved in model training, the edited images from such models tend to appear increasingly synthetic as the complexity of the editing instructions rises -- a phenomenon that intriguingly also manifests in the latest GPT-4o outputs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑