arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2504.03300cs.HCcs.CY
收藏

论测试 AI 监管中人类监督要求合规性的复杂性

On the Complexities of Testing for Compliance with Human Oversight Requirements in AI Regulation

Markus Langer, Veronika Lazar, Kevin Baum

AI总结:

本文分析欧洲 AI 法案中人类监督要求的合规测试难题,指出清单法与实证测试的权衡、更新时机、情境依赖及标准难操作化等挑战。

摘要:

人类监督要求是欧洲 AI 法案以及 AI 治理的核心组成部分。本文重点指出了测试这些要求合规性时面临的关键挑战。核心困难在于如何在简单但可能无效的基于清单的方法,与资源密集且依赖情境的实证测试之间取得平衡,后者用于检验人类对 AI 的监督有效性。关于何时更新合规测试、人类监督要求依赖情境的性质,以及难以操作化的标准等问题,进一步使合规测试复杂化。我们认为,这些挑战体现了社会技术 AI 治理未来中更广泛的挑战,即从确保良好技术产品转向良好社会技术系统的未来。

英文摘要:

Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requirements. A central difficulty lies in balancing simple, but potentially ineffective checklist-based approaches with resource-intensive and context-sensitive empirical testing of the effectiveness of human oversight of AI. Questions regarding when to update compliance testing, the context-dependent nature of human oversight requirements, and difficult-to-operationalize standards further complicate compliance testing. We argue that these challenges illustrate broader challenges in the future of sociotechnical AI governance, i.e. a future that shifts from ensuring good technological products to good sociotechnical systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑