arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2504.02826cs.CV

超越像素的构想:基于推理信息的视觉编辑基准测试

Envisioning Beyond the Pixels: Benchmarking Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing

Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学);Shanghai AI Laboratory(上海人工智能实验室);Wuhan University(武汉大学);Tongji University(同济大学);Princeton University(普林斯顿大学)

Xiangyu Zhao, Peiyuan Zhang, Kexian Tang, Xiaorong Zhu, Hao Li, Wenhao Chai, Zicheng Zhang, Renqiu Xia, Guangtao Zhai, Junchi Yan, Hua Yang, Xue Yang, Haodong Duan

AI总结:

为解决大型多模态模型在复杂视觉编辑中的推理缺陷,研究提出首个评估推理信息驱动视觉编辑的基准 RISEBench,涵盖四类推理并评估九大模型,揭示当前最强模型准确率仅28.8%,为该领域未来研究指明方向。

摘要:

大型多模态模型(LMMs)在视觉理解与生成方面取得了显著进展,但在通用视觉编辑中仍面临挑战,特别是在遵循复杂指令、保持外观一致性以及支持灵活输入格式方面。为了研究这一差距,我们引入了 RISEBench,这是首个用于评估推理信息驱动的视觉编辑(RISE)的基准。RISEBench 聚焦于四个关键推理类别:时间推理、因果推理、空间推理和逻辑推理。我们为每个类别策划了高质量的测试用例,并提出一个稳健的评估框架,通过人类评审和 LMM-as-a-judge(LMM作为评审)方法来评估指令推理、外观一致性和视觉合理性。我们进行了实验,评估了九个杰出的视觉编辑模型,包括开源和专有模型。评估结果表明,当前模型在基于推理的编辑任务中面临重大挑战。即使是评估中最强大的模型 GPT-4o-Image,其准确率也仅为 28.8%。RISEBench 有效突显了当代编辑模型的局限性,提供了有价值的见解,并指明了推理感知视觉编辑领域的潜在未来方向。我们的代码和数据已在 https://github.com/PhoenixZ810/RISEBench 发布。

英文摘要:

Large Multi-modality Models (LMMs) have made significant progress in visual understanding and generation, but they still face challenges in General Visual Editing, particularly in following complex instructions, preserving appearance consistency, and supporting flexible input formats. To study this gap, we introduce RISEBench, the first benchmark for evaluating Reasoning-Informed viSual Editing (RISE). RISEBench focuses on four key reasoning categories: Temporal, Causal, Spatial, and Logical Reasoning. We curate high-quality test cases for each category and propose an robust evaluation framework that assesses Instruction Reasoning, Appearance Consistency, and Visual Plausibility with both human judges and the LMM-as-a-judge approach. We conducted experiments evaluating nine prominent visual editing models, comprising both open-source and proprietary models. The evaluation results demonstrate that current models face significant challenges in reasoning-based editing tasks. Even the most powerful model evaluated, GPT-4o-Image, achieves an accuracy of merely 28.8%. RISEBench effectively highlights the limitations of contemporary editing models, provides valuable insights, and indicates potential future directions for the field of reasoning-aware visual editing. Our code and data have been released at https://github.com/PhoenixZ810/RISEBench.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑