arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.15463cs.CLcs.AI

从100万用户到每一位用户:面向用户级对齐的可扩展个性化偏好

From 1,000,000 Users to Every User: Scaling Up Personalized Preference for User-level Alignment

Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China(中国人民大学高瓴人工智能学院);Ant Group(蚂蚁集团)

Jia-Nan Li, Jian Guan, Songhao Wu, Wei Wu, Rui Yan

AI总结:

针对现有LLM对齐忽视用户偏好多样性的问题,本文提出可扩展个性化对齐框架,含偏好空间与角色表征,并构建AlignX数据集及两种对齐方法,在四个基准上平均提升17.06%准确率。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)传统上通过一种一刀切的方法进行对齐,这种方法假设人类偏好是统一的,从根本上忽视了用户价值观和需求的多样性。本文介绍了一个用于LLMs可扩展个性化对齐的综合框架。我们建立了一个系统化的偏好空间,刻画心理和行为维度,同时引入多样化的角色表征,以在真实场景中进行稳健的偏好推断。在此基础之上,我们推出了\ extsc{AlignX},一个包含超过130万个个性化偏好示例的大规模数据集,并开发了两种互补的对齐方法:\ extit{上下文内对齐}直接以角色表征为条件,以及\ extit{偏好桥接对齐}对中间偏好分布进行建模。大量实验表明,与现有方法相比,我们的方法有显著改进,在四个基准测试中平均准确率提升17.06%,同时展现出对新颖偏好的强大适应能力、对有限用户数据的稳健性以及精确的偏好可控性。这些结果验证了我们的方法在迈向用户自适应AI系统方面的有效性。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) have traditionally been aligned through one-size-fits-all approaches that assume uniform human preferences, fundamentally overlooking the diversity in user values and needs. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for scalable personalized alignment of LLMs. We establish a systematic preference space characterizing psychological and behavioral dimensions, alongside diverse persona representations for robust preference inference in real-world scenarios. Building upon this foundation, we introduce \textsc{AlignX}, a large-scale dataset of over 1.3 million personalized preference examples, and develop two complementary alignment approaches: \textit{in-context alignment} directly conditioning on persona representations and \textit{preference-bridged alignment} modeling intermediate preference distributions. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over existing methods, with an average 17.06\% accuracy gain across four benchmarks while exhibiting a strong adaptation capability to novel preferences, robustness to limited user data, and precise preference controllability. These results validate our approach toward user-adaptive AI systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑