arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2503.12592cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

MoECollab:通过协作式混合专家实现大语言模型开发的民主化

MoECollab: Democratizing LLM Development Through Collaborative Mixture of Experts

IIIT Delhi(德里印度信息技术学院)

Harshit

AI总结:

提出 MoECollab 框架,以可训练门控网络协调分布式专家模块,支持低资源协作开发 LLM,并在准确率、计算成本和专家利用率上取得显著提升。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLM)开发日益集中化,使参与主体局限于资源充足的组织。本文提出 MoECollab,这是一个利用混合专家(MoE)架构实现分布式、协作式 LLM 开发的新颖框架。通过将单体模型分解为由可训练门控网络协调的专业化专家模块,该框架使不同贡献者无论计算资源多少都能参与。我们提供了完整技术实现,涵盖专家动态、门控机制和集成策略的数学基础。在多个数据集上的实验表明,本方法相较基线模型取得 3%–7% 的准确率提升,同时将计算需求降低 34%。专家专业化带来显著的领域特定增益:通用分类任务的 F1 分数从 51% 提升至 88%,新闻分类的准确率从 23% 提升至 44%。我们形式化了路由熵优化问题,并证明适当的正则化技术可使专家利用率提高 14%。这些结果验证了 MoECollab 是通过架构支持的协作实现 LLM 开发民主化的有效方法。

英文摘要:

Large Language Model (LLM) development has become increasingly centralized, limiting participation to well-resourced organizations. This paper introduces MoECollab, a novel framework leveraging Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture to enable distributed, collaborative LLM development. By decomposing monolithic models into specialized expert modules coordinated by a trainable gating network, our framework allows diverse contributors to participate regardless of computational resources. We provide a complete technical implementation with mathematical foundations for expert dynamics, gating mechanisms, and integration strategies. Experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves accuracy improvements of 3-7% over baseline models while reducing computational requirements by 34%. Expert specialization yields significant domain-specific gains, with improvements from 51% to 88% F1 score in general classification and from 23% to 44% accuracy in news categorization. We formalize the routing entropy optimization problem and demonstrate how proper regularization techniques lead to 14% higher expert utilization rates. These results validate MoECollab as an effective approach for democratizing LLM development through architecturally-supported collaboration.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑