arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2503.11163cs.ROcs.CV

基于视觉的机器人抓取算法基准测试研究

A Benchmarking Study of Vision-based Robotic Grasping Algorithms

Bharath K Rameshbabu, Sumukh S Balakrishna, Brian Flynn, Vinarak Kapoor, Adam Norton, Holly Yanco, Berk Calli

AI总结:

该研究针对基于视觉的机器人抓取算法开展基准测试,对比不同类型算法在多条件下的表现,结合仿真与真实实验及跨实验室验证,为机器人操作算法开发提供参考。

摘要:

我们对采用不同方法的基于视觉的机器人抓取算法开展了基准测试研究,并提供了对比分析。具体而言,我们利用文献中已有的基准测试协议,对比了两种基于机器学习的算法和两种解析算法,明确了不同实验条件下各算法的优缺点。这些条件包括光照变化、背景纹理、不同噪声水平的相机以及夹爪。我们还在仿真环境和真实机器人上开展了类似实验,并呈现了两者间的差异。部分实验还在两个不同实验室采用相同协议开展,以进一步分析结果的可复现性。我们认为这项包含5040次实验的研究,为系统实验在机器人操作中的作用与挑战提供了重要洞见,并通过考量影响性能的因素为新算法的开发提供指引。实验记录和我们的基准测试软件已公开。

英文摘要:

We present a benchmarking study of vision-based robotic grasping algorithms with distinct approaches, and provide a comparative analysis. In particular, we compare two machine-learning-based and two analytical algorithms using an existing benchmarking protocol from the literature and determine the algorithm's strengths and weaknesses under different experimental conditions. These conditions include variations in lighting, background textures, cameras with different noise levels, and grippers. We also run analogous experiments in simulations and with real robots and present the discrepancies. Some experiments are also run in two different laboratories using same protocols to further analyze the repeatability of our results. We believe that this study, comprising 5040 experiments, provides important insights into the role and challenges of systematic experimentation in robotic manipulation, and guides the development of new algorithms by considering the factors that could impact the performance. The experiment recordings and our benchmarking software are publicly available.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑