arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2503.09735cs.CRcs.CVcs.LG

通过模型解释增强对抗样本检测

Enhancing Adversarial Example Detection Through Model Explanation

College of Information Sciences and Technology(信息科学与技术学院);The Pennsylvania State University(宾夕法尼亚州立大学);University of Pennsylvania(宾夕法尼亚大学)

Qian Ma, Ziping Ye

AI总结:

本文复现并分析基于模型解释检测对抗样本的 AmI 方法,指出其性能受超参数、操作系统和深度学习框架影响,实际适用性受限,并呼吁更鲁棒的防御与全面评估框架。

摘要:

对抗样本是机器学习模型面临的一个重大问题,促使人们持续寻找有效的防御方法。一个有前景的方向是利用模型解释来更好地理解并防御这些攻击。我们考察了 AmI,这是 NeurIPS 2018 一篇 spotlight 论文提出的方法,使用模型解释来检测对抗样本。研究表明,尽管 AmI 是一个有前景的想法,但其性能过度依赖特定设置(例如超参数)以及操作系统和所使用的深度学习框架等外部因素,这些缺陷限制了 AmI 的实际应用。我们的发现强调,需要在各种条件下都有效的更鲁棒防御机制。此外,我们倡导为防御技术建立一个全面的评估框架。

英文摘要:

Adversarial examples are a major problem for machine learning models, leading to a continuous search for effective defenses. One promising direction is to leverage model explanations to better understand and defend against these attacks. We looked at AmI, a method proposed by a NeurIPS 2018 spotlight paper that uses model explanations to detect adversarial examples. Our study shows that while AmI is a promising idea, its performance is too dependent on specific settings (e.g., hyperparameter) and external factors such as the operating system and the deep learning framework used, and such drawbacks limit AmI's practical usage. Our findings highlight the need for more robust defense mechanisms that are effective under various conditions. In addition, we advocate for a comprehensive evaluation framework for defense techniques.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑