arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.08884cs.CVcs.CLcs.LG

SpurLens:多模态大语言模型中虚假线索的自动检测

SpurLens: Automatic Detection of Spurious Cues in Multimodal LLMs

Department of Computer Science University of Maryland(计算机科学系大学马里兰大学)

Parsa Hosseini, Sumit Nawathe, Mazda Moayeri, Sriram Balasubramanian, Soheil Feizi

AI总结:

研究多模态大语言模型中虚假偏差,介绍SpurLens管道,利用GPT-4和开放集目标检测器自动识别虚假视觉线索,揭示虚假关联导致的两种失败模式,验证发现并探索缓解策略,呼吁提高评估方法和策略以增强MLLMs可靠性。

摘要:

已知单模态视觉模型依赖虚假关联,但尚不清楚多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)在语言监督下表现出类似偏差的程度。本文研究MLLMs中的虚假偏差,并引入SpurLens,这是一种利用GPT-4和开放集目标检测器在无人工监督下自动识别虚假视觉线索的管道。研究发现虚假关联在MLLMs中导致两种主要失败模式:过度依赖虚假线索进行目标识别以及目标幻觉。在各种MLLMs和数据集上验证了这些发现。除了诊断这些失败,还探索了潜在缓解策略并进行消融研究。研究呼吁采用更严格的评估方法和缓解策略来提高MLLMs的可靠性。

英文摘要:

Unimodal vision models are known to rely on spurious correlations, but it remains unclear to what extent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exhibit similar biases despite language supervision. In this paper, we investigate spurious bias in MLLMs and introduce SpurLens, a pipeline that leverages GPT-4 and open-set object detectors to automatically identify spurious visual cues without human supervision. Our findings reveal that spurious correlations cause two major failure modes in MLLMs: (1) over-reliance on spurious cues for object recognition, where removing these cues reduces accuracy, and (2) object hallucination, where spurious cues amplify the hallucination by over 10x. We validate our findings in various MLLMs and datasets. Beyond diagnosing these failures, we explore potential mitigation strategies, such as prompt ensembling and reasoning-based prompting, and conduct ablation studies to examine the root causes of spurious bias in MLLMs. By exposing the persistence of spurious correlations, our study calls for more rigorous evaluation methods and mitigation strategies to enhance the reliability of MLLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑