arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.08031cs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.MLstat.TH
收藏

图稀疏化的经验误差估计

Empirical Error Estimates for Graph Sparsification

University of California, Davis(加州大学戴维斯分校)

Siyao Wang, Miles E. Lopes

AI总结:

本文提出一种数据驱动的经验误差估计方法,用于量化图稀疏化中随机误差对下游计算的影响,并在拉普拉斯近似、图割查询、图结构回归和谱聚类四个场景中验证其通用性,同时给出理论保证和成本分析。

摘要:

图稀疏化是一种成熟的加速基于图的学习算法的技术,它利用边采样来用稀疏图近似稠密图。由于稀疏化误差是随机的且未知的,用户必须面对下游计算结果可靠性的不确定性。尽管用户可以从文献中的理论误差界获得概念性指导,但这类结果在数值层面通常不实用。我们采取另一种方法,提出从数据驱动的角度解决这些问题,即计算经验误差估计。所提出的误差估计具有高度通用性,我们在四个用例中展示了这一点:拉普拉斯矩阵近似、图割查询、图结构回归和谱聚类。此外,我们为误差估计提供了两个理论保证,并解释了与典型图稀疏化工作流的总体成本相比,计算这些误差估计的成本为何是可控的。

英文摘要:

Graph sparsification is a well-established technique for accelerating graph-based learning algorithms, which uses edge sampling to approximate dense graphs with sparse ones. Because the sparsification error is random and unknown, users must contend with uncertainty about the reliability of downstream computations. Although it is possible for users to obtain conceptual guidance from theoretical error bounds in the literature, such results are typically impractical at a numerical level. Taking an alternative approach, we propose to address these issues from a data-driven perspective by computing empirical error estimates. The proposed error estimates are highly versatile, and we demonstrate this in four use cases: Laplacian matrix approximation, graph cut queries, graph-structured regression, and spectral clustering. Moreover, we provide two theoretical guarantees for the error estimates, and explain why the cost of computing them is manageable in comparison to the overall cost of a typical graph sparsification workflow.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑