arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.06339cs.LGcs.CV

学会在遗忘的同时保留:对抗机器遗忘中的梯度冲突

Learning to Unlearn while Retaining: Combating Gradient Conflicts in Machine Unlearning

Gaurav Patel, Qiang Qiu

AI总结:

针对机器遗忘中遗忘与保留目标的梯度冲突问题,提出 Learning to Unlearn while Retaining,通过隐式梯度正则化兼顾有效遗忘与模型性能。

摘要:

机器遗忘最近引起了广泛关注,其目标是选择性地移除与特定数据相关的知识,同时保留模型在剩余数据上的性能。这一过程中的一个根本挑战是平衡有效遗忘与知识保留,因为对这些相互竞争目标的朴素优化可能导致梯度冲突,从而阻碍收敛并降低整体性能。为解决该问题,我们提出 Learning to Unlearn while Retaining,旨在缓解遗忘目标与保留目标之间的梯度冲突。我们的方法通过在所提出框架内自然产生的隐式梯度正则化机制,策略性地避免冲突。这防止了遗忘与保留之间的梯度冲突,从而在保留模型效用的同时实现有效遗忘。我们在判别式和生成式任务上验证了该方法,证明其能够在不损害剩余数据性能的情况下完成遗忘。结果突显了避免此类梯度冲突的优势,并且优于那些未考虑这些相互作用的现有方法。

英文摘要:

Machine Unlearning has recently garnered significant attention, aiming to selectively remove knowledge associated with specific data while preserving the model's performance on the remaining data. A fundamental challenge in this process is balancing effective unlearning with knowledge retention, as naive optimization of these competing objectives can lead to conflicting gradients, hindering convergence and degrading overall performance. To address this issue, we propose Learning to Unlearn while Retaining, aimed to mitigate gradient conflicts between unlearning and retention objectives. Our approach strategically avoids conflicts through an implicit gradient regularization mechanism that emerges naturally within the proposed framework. This prevents conflicting gradients between unlearning and retention, leading to effective unlearning while preserving the model's utility. We validate our approach across both discriminative and generative tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving unlearning without compromising performance on remaining data. Our results highlight the advantages of avoiding such gradient conflicts, outperforming existing methods that fail to account for these interactions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑