arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
今晚才能更新了~~大家休息下再来吧
arXiv 2503.03499cs.LG
收藏

State-offset Tuning:面向状态空间模型的基于状态的参数高效微调

State-offset Tuning: State-based Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for State Space Models

Seoul National University(首尔国立大学);FuriosaAI;UW-Madison(威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校);Ajou University(全州大学)

Wonjun Kang, Kevin Galim, Yuchen Zeng, Minjae Lee, Hyung Il Koo, Nam Ik Cho

AI总结:

针对 SSM 中提示类 PEFT 效果不佳的问题,本文提出直接调整状态特征的 State-offset Tuning,并在多数据集实验中验证其适配有效性。

摘要:

状态空间模型(SSM)已成为 Transformer 的高效替代方案,可缓解 Transformer 的二次计算成本问题。然而,参数高效微调(PEFT)方法在 SSM 上的应用仍基本未被探索。特别是,在 Transformer 中广泛使用的 Prompt Tuning 和 Prefix-Tuning 等基于提示的方法,在 SSM 上表现不佳。为解决这一问题,我们提出基于状态的方法,作为基于提示方法的更优替代。这一新方法族自然源于 SSM 的架构特征。基于状态的方法直接调整与状态相关的特征,而不是依赖外部提示。此外,我们提出一种新颖的基于状态的 PEFT 方法:State-offset Tuning。在每个时间步,我们的方法直接影响当前步骤的状态,从而实现更有效的适配。通过在多种数据集上的大量实验,我们证明了该方法的有效性。代码可在 https://github.com/furiosa-ai/ssm-state-tuning 获取。

英文摘要:

State Space Models (SSMs) have emerged as efficient alternatives to Transformers, mitigating their quadratic computational cost. However, the application of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods to SSMs remains largely unexplored. In particular, prompt-based methods like Prompt Tuning and Prefix-Tuning, which are widely used in Transformers, do not perform well on SSMs. To address this, we propose state-based methods as a superior alternative to prompt-based methods. This new family of methods naturally stems from the architectural characteristics of SSMs. State-based methods adjust state-related features directly instead of depending on external prompts. Furthermore, we introduce a novel state-based PEFT method: State-offset Tuning. At every timestep, our method directly affects the state at the current step, leading to more effective adaptation. Through extensive experiments across diverse datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Code is available at https://github.com/furiosa-ai/ssm-state-tuning.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑