arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
今晚才能更新了~~大家休息下再来吧
arXiv 2502.20008cs.CV
收藏

联合融合与编码:从底层推进多模态检索

Joint Fusion and Encoding: Advancing Multimodal Retrieval from the Ground Up

The University of Tokyo(东京大学)

Lang Huang, Qiyu Wu, Zhongtao Miao, Toshihiko Yamasaki

AI总结:

本文提出从底层融合视觉与文本的联合融合编码检索框架,采用单塔架构和两阶段训练,在复杂多模态检索中优于传统方法,尤其提升需模态融合的任务。

摘要:

信息检索对于当今的互联网应用不可或缺,然而传统的语义匹配技术往往在捕捉复杂查询所需的细粒度跨模态交互方面力有不逮。尽管晚期融合的双塔架构试图通过独立编码视觉和文本数据,然后在高层次上进行合并来弥合这一差距,但它们常常忽略了全面理解所必需的微妙交互。在这项工作中,我们严格评估了这些局限性,并引入了一个统一的检索框架,该框架从底层融合视觉和文本线索,实现早期跨模态交互以增强上下文理解。通过一个两阶段的训练过程——包括训练后适应和指令微调——我们采用简单的单塔架构将多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)适配为检索器。我们的方法在多种检索场景中优于传统方法,尤其是在处理复杂的多模态输入时。值得注意的是,联合融合编码器在需要模态融合的任务上比在不需要模态融合的任务上带来了更大的改进,这凸显了早期融合策略的变革潜力,并为上下文感知且有效的信息检索指明了有前景的方向。

英文摘要:

Information retrieval is indispensable for today's Internet applications, yet traditional semantic matching techniques often fall short in capturing the fine-grained cross-modal interactions required for complex queries. Although late-fusion two-tower architectures attempt to bridge this gap by independently encoding visual and textual data before merging them at a high level, they frequently overlook the subtle interplay essential for comprehensive understanding. In this work, we rigorously assess these limitations and introduce a unified retrieval framework that fuses visual and textual cues from the ground up, enabling early cross-modal interactions for enhancing context interpretation. Through a two-stage training process--comprising post-training adaptation followed by instruction tuning--we adapt MLLMs as retrievers using a simple one-tower architecture. Our approach outperforms conventional methods across diverse retrieval scenarios, particularly when processing complex multi-modal inputs. Notably, the joint fusion encoder yields greater improvements on tasks that require modality fusion compared to those that do not, underscoring the transformative potential of early integration strategies and pointing toward a promising direction for contextually aware and effective information retrieval.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑