arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.08077cs.LG

抗对抗性篡改的级联老虎机

Cascading Bandits Robust to Adversarial Corruptions

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科技大学);East China Normal University(华东师范大学);The Chinese University of Hong Kong(香港中文大学);Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学)

Jize Xie, Cheng Chen, Zhiyong Wang, Shuai Li

AI总结:

针对级联老虎机受对抗性篡改(如点击欺诈)时性能下降的问题,提出CBAC问题并设计两种分别假设篡改水平已知和未知的鲁棒算法,理论证明其未受攻击时对数级遗憾、受攻击时遗憾随篡改水平线性增加,实验验证了鲁棒性。

摘要:

在线排序学习从大型候选集中依次向用户推荐一小部分物品,并接收用户的点击反馈。在许多现实场景中,用户按顺序浏览推荐列表,点击第一个有吸引力的物品而不查看其余物品。这种行为通常被建模为级联模型。近期许多工作研究级联老虎机的算法,这是一种基于级联模型的在线排序学习框架。然而,如果部分用户反馈受到对抗性篡改(例如点击欺诈),现有方法的性能可能大幅下降。在本工作中,我们研究如何在级联老虎机中抵抗对抗性篡改。首先,我们提出“带对抗性篡改的级联老虎机”(CBAC)问题,假设存在一个自适应对手可能操纵用户反馈。然后,我们针对该问题提出两种鲁棒算法,分别假设篡改水平已知和未知。我们证明,当算法未受攻击时,两种算法均可实现对数级遗憾,且遗憾随篡改水平线性增加。实验结果也验证了我们方法的鲁棒性。

英文摘要:

Online learning to rank sequentially recommends a small list of items to users from a large candidate set and receives the users' click feedback. In many real-world scenarios, users browse the recommended list in order and click the first attractive item without checking the rest. Such behaviors are usually formulated as the cascade model. Many recent works study algorithms for cascading bandits, an online learning to rank framework in the cascade model. However, the performance of existing methods may drop significantly if part of the user feedback is adversarially corrupted (e.g., click fraud). In this work, we study how to resist adversarial corruptions in cascading bandits. We first formulate the ``\textit{Cascading Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions}" (CBAC) problem, which assumes that there is an adaptive adversary that may manipulate the user feedback. Then we propose two robust algorithms for this problem, which assume the corruption level is known and agnostic, respectively. We show that both algorithms can achieve logarithmic regret when the algorithm is not under attack, and the regret increases linearly with the corruption level. The experimental results also verify the robustness of our methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑