arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.08058cs.DCcs.LG

通用编码计算:对抗性设置

General Coded Computing: Adversarial Settings

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities(明尼苏达大学双城分校)

Parsa Moradi, Hanzaleh Akbarinodehi, Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali

AI总结:

本文为通用编码计算奠定基础,扩展其适用性至广泛计算类别并解决对抗性服务器问题,证明方案在N台服务器含O(Nᵃ)对抗服务器时误差上确界以N^(6/5(a-1))衰减,实现最优对抗鲁棒性,且在深度神经网络推理等任务中验证有效。

摘要:

传统编码计算框架主要针对结构化计算(如矩阵乘法和多项式求值)量身定制。这类任务允许复用代数编码理论的工具和技术,以提升分布式系统在存在掉队服务器和对抗性服务器时的可靠性。本文为通用编码计算奠定了基础,将编码计算的适用性扩展到处理广泛的计算类别。此外,本文特别解决了管理对抗性服务器这一挑战性问题。我们证明,在提出的方案中,对于一个包含N台服务器、其中O(Nᵃ)台(a∈[0,1))为对抗性的系统,在对计算任务的最小假设下,所有对抗性策略的平均近似误差的上确界以N^(6/5(a-1))的速率衰减。此外,我们表明,在通用框架内,所提出的方案在可容忍的最大对抗性服务器数量方面实现了最优的对抗鲁棒性。这标志着向实用且可靠的通用编码计算迈出了重要一步。实现结果进一步验证了所提出方法在处理各种计算(包括深度神经网络推理)时的有效性。

英文摘要:

Conventional coded computing frameworks are predominantly tailored for structured computations, such as matrix multiplication and polynomial evaluation. Such tasks allow the reuse of tools and techniques from algebraic coding theory to improve the reliability of distributed systems in the presence of stragglers and adversarial servers. This paper lays the foundation for general coded computing, which extends the applicability of coded computing to handle a wide class of computations. In addition, it particularly addresses the challenging problem of managing adversarial servers. We demonstrate that, in the proposed scheme, for a system with $N$ servers, where $\mathcal{O}(N^a)$, $a \in [0,1)$, are adversarial, the supremum of the average approximation error over all adversarial strategies decays at a rate of $N^{\frac{6}{5}(a-1)}$, under minimal assumptions on the computing tasks. Furthermore, we show that within a general framework, the proposed scheme achieves optimal adversarial robustness, in terms of maximum number of adversarial servers it can tolerate. This marks a significant step toward practical and reliable general coded computing. Implementation results further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in handling various computations, including inference in deep neural networks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑