arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2502.08041cs.LGcs.ITmath.IT
收藏

分类的艺术:过多的类别,点不足

The Art of Misclassification: Too Many Classes, Not Enough Points

Universidad Simón Bolívar(simón bolívar大学);Grupo de Investigación en Ecología y Biogeografía. Universidad de Pamplona(生态与生物地理学研究组,帕尔米拉大学)

Mario Franco, Gerardo Febres, Nelson Fernández, Carlos Gershenson

AI总结:

本文提出基于熵的分类可行性度量,用于量化分类任务的固有难度,并揭示分类性能的理论极限。

摘要:

分类是人工智能和机器学习中普遍存在且基础的问题,已有大量努力致力于开发更强大的分类器和更大的数据集。然而,分类任务最终受到数据集内在属性的限制,与计算能力或模型复杂性无关。在本文中,我们引入了一个基于熵的形式度量,用于衡量分类的可行性,该度量通过评估特征表示下的类别分配不确定性来量化分类问题的固有难度。该度量捕捉了类别重叠的程度,并符合人类直觉,作为分类问题的分类性能上限。我们的结果建立了一个理论极限,超过该极限后,无论分类器的架构或数据量如何,在给定问题中都无法提高分类准确率。我们的方法提供了一个原则性的框架,用于理解何时分类本质上是易错且根本上模糊的。

英文摘要:

Classification is a ubiquitous and fundamental problem in artificial intelligence and machine learning, with extensive efforts dedicated to developing more powerful classifiers and larger datasets. However, the classification task is ultimately constrained by the intrinsic properties of datasets, independently of computational power or model complexity. In this work, we introduce a formal entropy-based measure of classificability, which quantifies the inherent difficulty of a classification problem by assessing the uncertainty in class assignments given feature representations. This measure captures the degree of class overlap and aligns with human intuition, serving as an upper bound on classification performance for classification problems. Our results establish a theoretical limit beyond which no classifier can improve the classification accuracy, regardless of the architecture or amount of data, in a given problem. Our approach provides a principled framework for understanding when classification is inherently fallible and fundamentally ambiguous.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑