arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2502.06445cs.CV

动态视频环境中视觉-语言模型在光学字符识别任务上的基准测试

Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Optical Character Recognition in Dynamic Video Environments

VideoDB

Sankalp Nagaonkar, Augustya Sharma, Ashish Choithani, Ashutosh Trivedi

AI总结:

本文提出动态视频环境OCR任务的开源基准,含1477个多领域标注帧,对比3个先进VLMs与传统OCR系统,分析其优劣势并公开资源以推动相关研究。

摘要:

本文介绍了一个开源基准,用于评估视觉-语言模型(VLMs)在动态视频环境中的光学字符识别(OCR)任务。我们提出了一个精心整理的数据集,包含1477个手动标注的帧,涵盖代码编辑器、新闻广播、YouTube视频和广告等不同领域。我们将Claude-3、Gemini-1.5和GPT-4o这三个最先进的VLMs与EasyOCR、RapidOCR等传统OCR系统进行了基准测试。评估指标包括词错误率(WER)、字符错误率(CER)和准确率。我们的结果突出了VLMs在基于视频的OCR任务中的优势和局限性,表明它们在许多场景中有可能优于传统OCR模型。然而,幻觉、内容安全政策以及对遮挡或风格化文本的敏感性等挑战仍然存在。该数据集和基准测试框架已公开,以促进进一步研究。

英文摘要:

This paper introduces an open-source benchmark for evaluating Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) tasks in dynamic video environments. We present a curated dataset containing 1,477 manually annotated frames spanning diverse domains, including code editors, news broadcasts, YouTube videos, and advertisements. Three state of the art VLMs - Claude-3, Gemini-1.5, and GPT-4o are benchmarked against traditional OCR systems such as EasyOCR and RapidOCR. Evaluation metrics include Word Error Rate (WER), Character Error Rate (CER), and Accuracy. Our results highlight the strengths and limitations of VLMs in video-based OCR tasks, demonstrating their potential to outperform conventional OCR models in many scenarios. However, challenges such as hallucinations, content security policies, and sensitivity to occluded or stylized text remain. The dataset and benchmarking framework are publicly available to foster further research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑