Many forms of sensitive data, such as web traffic, mobility data, or hospital occupancy, are inherently sequential. The standard method for training machine learning models while ensuring privacy for units of sensitive information, such as individual hospital visits, is differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD). However, we observe in this work that the formal guarantees of DP-SGD are incompatible with time series specific tasks like forecasting, since they rely on the privacy amplification attained by training on small, unstructured batches sampled from an unstructured dataset. In contrast, batches for forecasting are generated by (1) sampling sequentially structured time series from a dataset, (2) sampling contiguous subsequences from these series, and (3) partitioning them into context and ground-truth forecast windows. We theoretically analyze the privacy amplification attained by this structured subsampling to enable the training of forecasting models with sound and tight event- and user-level privacy guarantees. Towards more private models, we additionally prove how data augmentation amplifies privacy in self-supervised training of sequence models. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that amplification by structured subsampling enables the training of forecasting models with strong formal privacy guarantees.
Amazon Research（亚马逊研究院）；IMDEA Software Institute（IMDEA软件研究所）；University at Buffalo (SUNY)（布法罗大学（纽约州立大学））
Differential privacy comes equipped with multiple analytical tools for the design of private data analyses. One important tool is the so-called "privacy amplification by subsampling" principle, which ensures that a differentially private mechanism run on a random subsample of a population provides higher privacy guarantees than when run on the entire population. Several instances of this principle have been studied for different random subsampling methods, each with an ad-hoc analysis. In this paper we present a general method that recovers and improves prior analyses, yields lower bounds and …
This chapter is meant to be part of the book "Differential Privacy for Artificial Intelligence Applications." We give an introduction to the most important property of differential privacy -- composition: running multiple independent analyses on the data of a set of people will still be differentially private as long as each of the analyses is private on its own -- as well as the related topic of privacy amplification by subsampling. This chapter introduces the basic concepts and gives proofs of the key results needed to apply these tools in practice.
Clustering is an essential primitive in unsupervised machine learning. We bring forth the problem of sublinear-time differentially-private clustering as a natural and well-motivated direction of research. We combine the $k$-means and $k$-median sublinear-time results of Mishra et al. (SODA, 2001) and of Czumaj and Sohler (Rand. Struct. and Algorithms, 2007) with recent results on private clustering of Balcan et al. (ICML 2017), Gupta et al. (SODA, 2010) and Ghazi et al. (NeurIPS, 2020) to obtain sublinear-time private $k$-means and $k$-median algorithms via subsampling. We also investigate the…
Running a randomized algorithm on a subsampled dataset instead of the entire dataset amplifies differential privacy guarantees. In this work, in a federated setting, we consider random participation of the clients in addition to subsampling their local datasets. Since such random participation of the clients creates correlation among the samples of the same client in their subsampling, we analyze the corresponding privacy amplification via non-uniform subsampling. We show that when the size of the local datasets is small, the privacy guarantees via random participation is close to those of the…
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT（赫尔辛基信息技术研究所）；University of Helsinki（赫尔辛基大学）；Waseda University（早稻田大学）；Aalto University（阿尔托大学）；University of Manchester（曼彻斯特大学）
Strict privacy is of paramount importance in distributed machine learning. Federated learning, with the main idea of communicating only what is needed for learning, has been recently introduced as a general approach for distributed learning to enhance learning and improve security. However, federated learning by itself does not guarantee any privacy for data subjects. To quantify and control how much privacy is compromised in the worst-case, we can use differential privacy. In this paper we combine additively homomorphic secure summation protocols with differential privacy in the so-called cro…
Aggregate time-series data like traffic flow and site occupancy repeatedly sample statistics from a population across time. Such data can be profoundly useful for understanding trends within a given population, but also pose a significant privacy risk, potentially revealing e.g., who spends time where. Producing a private version of a time-series satisfying the standard definition of Differential Privacy (DP) is challenging due to the large influence a single participant can have on the sequence: if an individual can contribute to each time step, the amount of additive noise needed to satisfy …
Statistical Inference for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent
Center for Data Science, Zhejiang University（浙江大学数据科学中心）；Department of Statistics, Rutgers University（罗格斯大学统计系）；Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong（香港大学商学院）
DeepMind；Google（谷歌）；Google Research - Brain（谷歌研究院 - Brain）
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) forms a fundamental building block in many applications for learning over sensitive data. Two standard approaches, privacy amplification by subsampling, and privacy amplification by shuffling, permit adding lower noise in DP-SGD than via na\"ıve schemes. A key assumption in both these approaches is that the elements in the data set can be uniformly sampled, or be uniformly permuted -- constraints that may become prohibitive when the data is processed in a decentralized or distributed fashion. In this paper, we focus on conducting iter…
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology（香港科技大学）；University of Utah（犹他大学）；University of California, Los Angeles（加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校）
Federated learning aims to protect data privacy by collaboratively learning a model without sharing private data among users. However, an adversary may still be able to infer the private training data by attacking the released model. Differential privacy provides a statistical protection against such attacks at the price of significantly degrading the accuracy or utility of the trained models. In this paper, we investigate a utility enhancement scheme based on Laplacian smoothing for differentially private federated learning (DP-Fed-LS), where the parameter aggregation with injected Gaussian n…
We study the problem of subsampling in differential privacy (DP), a question that is the centerpiece behind many successful differentially private machine learning algorithms. Specifically, we provide a tight upper bound on the Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP) (Mironov, 2017) parameters for algorithms that: (1) subsample the dataset, and then (2) applies a randomized mechanism M to the subsample, in terms of the RDP parameters of M and the subsampling probability parameter. Our results generalize the moments accounting technique, developed by Abadi et al. (2016) for the Gaussian mechanism, to …
Renmin University of China（中国人民大学）；Kyoto University（京都大学）
Federated Learning (FL) is a promising machine learning paradigm that enables the analyzer to train a model without collecting users' raw data. To ensure users' privacy, differentially private federated learning has been intensively studied. The existing works are mainly based on the \textit{curator model} or \textit{local model} of differential privacy. However, both of them have pros and cons. The curator model allows greater accuracy but requires a trusted analyzer. In the local model where users randomize local data before sending them to the analyzer, a trusted analyzer is not required bu…
University of Halmstad（哈尔姆斯塔德大学）；Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT（赫尔辛基信息技术研究所 HIIT）；University of Helsinki（赫尔辛基大学）；Aalto University（阿尔托大学）
Recent developments in differentially private (DP) machine learning and DP Bayesian learning have enabled learning under strong privacy guarantees for the training data subjects. In this paper, we further extend the applicability of DP Bayesian learning by presenting the first general DP Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm whose privacy-guarantees are not subject to unrealistic assumptions on Markov chain convergence and that is applicable to posterior inference in arbitrary models. Our algorithm is based on a decomposition of the Barker acceptance test that allows evaluating the Rényi D…
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT)（赫尔辛基信息技术研究所）；University of Helsinki（赫尔辛基大学）
Many machine learning applications are based on data collected from people, such as their tastes and behaviour as well as biological traits and genetic data. Regardless of how important the application might be, one has to make sure individuals' identities or the privacy of the data are not compromised in the analysis. Differential privacy constitutes a powerful framework that prevents breaching of data subject privacy from the output of a computation. Differentially private versions of many important Bayesian inference methods have been proposed, but there is a lack of an efficient unified ap…
Privacy Amplification in Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Hidden States
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan（台湾国立台湾大学电子工程系）；NTU Artificial Intelligence Center of Research Excellence (NTU AI-CoRE), Taiwan（国立台湾大学人工智能研究中心（NTU AI-CoRE））；Microsoft, USA（微软公司）；Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA（佐治亚理工学院电子与计算机工程系）
Balancing privacy and accuracy is a major challenge in designing differentially private machine learning algorithms. One way to improve this tradeoff for free is to leverage the noise in common data operations that already use randomness. Such operations include noisy SGD and data subsampling. The additional noise in these operations may amplify the privacy guarantee of the overall algorithm, a phenomenon known as privacy amplification. In this paper, we analyze the privacy amplification of sampling from a multidimensional Bernoulli distribution family given the parameter from a private algori…
Recent work of Erlingsson, Feldman, Mironov, Raghunathan, Talwar, and Thakurta [EFMRTT19] demonstrates that random shuffling amplifies differential privacy guarantees of locally randomized data. Such amplification implies substantially stronger privacy guarantees for systems in which data is contributed anonymously [BEMMRLRKTS17] and has lead to significant interest in the shuffle model of privacy [CSUZZ19; EFMRTT19]. We show that random shuffling of $n$ data records that are input to $\varepsilon_0$-differentially private local randomizers results in an $(O((1-e^{-\varepsilon_0})\sqrt{\frac{e…
Prior work on differential privacy analysis of randomized SGD algorithms relies on composition theorems, where the implicit (unrealistic) assumption is that the internal state of the iterative algorithm is revealed to the adversary. As a result, the Rényi DP bounds derived by such composition-based analyses linearly grow with the number of training epochs. When the internal state of the algorithm is hidden, we prove a converging privacy bound for noisy stochastic gradient descent (on strongly convex smooth loss functions). We show how to take advantage of privacy amplification by sub-sampling …
Beyond Statistical Estimation: Differentially Private Individual Computation via Shuffling
Guangzhou University（广州大学）；National University of Singapore（新加坡国立大学）；King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)（阿卜杜拉国王科技大学）；University of Southampton（南安普顿大学）
When applied to large-scale learning problems, the conventional wisdom on privacy-preserving deep learning, known as Differential Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), has met with limited success due to significant performance degradation and high memory overhead when compared to the non-privacy counterpart. We show how to mitigate the performance drop by replacing the DP-SGD with a novel DP Forward-Propagation (DP-FP) followed by an off-the-shelf non-DP optimizer. Our DP-FP employs novel (1) representation clipping followed by noise addition in the forward propagation stage, as well …
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular technique for modelling graph-structured data and computing node-level representations via aggregation of information from the neighborhood of each node. However, this aggregation implies an increased risk of revealing sensitive information, as a node can participate in the inference for multiple nodes. This implies that standard privacy-preserving machine learning techniques, such as differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) - which are designed for situations where each data point participates in the inference for one point only - …
In this paper we consider the problem of minimizing composite objective functions consisting of a convex differentiable loss function plus a non-smooth regularization term, such as $L_1$ norm or nuclear norm, under Rényi differential privacy (RDP). To solve the problem, we propose two stochastic alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithms: ssADMM based on gradient perturbation and mpADMM based on output perturbation. Both algorithms decompose the original problem into sub-problems that have closed-form solutions. The first algorithm, ssADMM, applies the recent privacy amplifi…
Training large neural networks with meaningful/usable differential privacy security guarantees is a demanding challenge. In this paper, we tackle this problem by revisiting the two key operations in Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD): 1) iterative perturbation and 2) gradient clipping. We propose a generic optimization framework, called {\em ModelMix}, which performs random aggregation of intermediate model states. It strengthens the composite privacy analysis utilizing the entropy of the training trajectory and improves the $(ε, δ)$ DP security parameters by an order …
The performance of private gradient-based optimization algorithms is highly dependent on the choice of step size (or learning rate) which often requires non-trivial amount of tuning. In this paper, we introduce a stochastic variant of classic backtracking line search algorithm that satisfies Rényi differential privacy. Specifically, the proposed algorithm adaptively chooses the step size satsisfying the the Armijo condition (with high probability) using noisy gradients and function estimates. Furthermore, to improve the probability with which the chosen step size satisfies the condition, it ad…
Accurately learning from user data while ensuring quantifiable privacy guarantees provides an opportunity to build better Machine Learning (ML) models while maintaining user trust. Recent literature has demonstrated the applicability of a generalized form of Differential Privacy to provide guarantees over text queries. Such mechanisms add privacy preserving noise to vectorial representations of text in high dimension and return a text based projection of the noisy vectors. However, these mechanisms are sub-optimal in their trade-off between privacy and utility. This is due to factors such as a…
Propose-Test-Release (PTR) is a differential privacy framework that works with local sensitivity of functions, instead of their global sensitivity. This framework is typically used for releasing robust statistics such as median or trimmed mean in a differentially private manner. While PTR is a common framework introduced over a decade ago, using it in applications such as robust SGD where we need many adaptive robust queries is challenging. This is mainly due to the lack of Renyi Differential Privacy (RDP) analysis, an essential ingredient underlying the moments accountant approach for differe…
On the Inherent Privacy Amplification of Missing Data
Sorbonne Université（索邦大学）；Université Paris Cité（巴黎城市大学）；CNRS（国家科学研究中心）；Laboratoire de Probabilités, Statistique et Modélisation（概率、统计与建模实验室）；LPSM（LPSM实验室）
Deep Learning under Fractional-Order Differential Privacy
MESA Lab, Dept. of EECS University of California, Merced（加州大学默塞德分校电子工程与计算机科学系MESA实验室）；Dept. of Applied Mathematics University of California, Merced（加州大学默塞德分校应用数学系）
We consider training models with differential privacy (DP) using mini-batch gradients. The existing state-of-the-art, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), requires privacy amplification by sampling or shuffling to obtain the best privacy/accuracy/computation trade-offs. Unfortunately, the precise requirements on exact sampling and shuffling can be hard to obtain in important practical scenarios, particularly federated learning (FL). We design and analyze a DP variant of Follow-The-Regularized-Leader (DP-FTRL) that compares favorably (both theoretically and empirically) …
Differentially Private Active Learning: Balancing Effective Data Selection and Privacy
Technical University of Munich (TUM)（慕尼黑工业大学）；TUM University Hospital（慕尼黑工业大学医院）；Imperial College London（伦敦帝国理工学院）；Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML)（慕尼黑机器学习中心）；Helmholtz Munich（亥姆霍兹慕尼黑中心）；deepc GmbH（deepc有限公司）
