arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.01916cs.ROcs.LG

可泛化的快速代理模型:基于物理信息神经网络的铰接式软体机器人模型预测控制

Generalizable and Fast Surrogates: Model Predictive Control of Articulated Soft Robots using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Leibniz University Hannover(莱布尼茨汉诺威大学)

Tim-Lukas Habich, Aran Mohammad, Simon F. G. Ehlers, Martin Bensch, Thomas Seel, Moritz Schappler

AI总结:

针对铰接式软体机器人控制中第一性原理模型速度慢、黑箱模型泛化差的问题,提出高数据效率的物理信息神经网络,实现了高速精准预测,支撑了47Hz频率下的非线性模型预测控制与精准位置跟踪。

摘要:

软体机器人可彻底变革对灵巧性和安全性要求极高的多个应用场景。运行这类系统时,实时估计与控制需要快速且精准的模型。但第一性原理(FP)模型的预测速度慢,而学习得到的黑箱模型泛化性较差。物理信息机器学习在这方面具备显著优势,但目前其应用局限于简单的、多为仿真的系统,未考虑训练后的变化。我们针对铰接式软体机器人(ASRs)提出聚焦数据效率的物理信息神经网络(PINNs),将昂贵的真实世界训练数据量降至最低——仅需单个系统域内的一个数据集。研究使用不同域内共两小时的数据,与两种金标准方法开展对比:与循环神经网络相比,该PINN具备高泛化性;在精度略有下降的情况下,该PINN的预测速度最高可达精准FP模型的467倍。这一特性使得气动铰接式软体机器人的非线性模型预测控制(MPC)成为可能,在6项动态实验中,运行频率达47Hz的MPC实现了精准的位置跟踪。

英文摘要:

Soft robots can revolutionize several applications with high demands on dexterity and safety. When operating these systems, real-time estimation and control require fast and accurate models. However, prediction with first-principles (FP) models is slow, and learned black-box models have poor generalizability. Physics-informed machine learning offers excellent advantages here, but it is currently limited to simple, often simulated systems without considering changes after training. We propose physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for articulated soft robots (ASRs) with a focus on data efficiency. The amount of expensive real-world training data is reduced to a minimum -- one dataset in one system domain. Two hours of data in different domains are used for a comparison against two gold-standard approaches: In contrast to a recurrent neural network, the PINN provides a high generalizability. The prediction speed of an accurate FP model is exceeded with the PINN by up to a factor of 467 at slightly reduced accuracy. This enables nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) of a pneumatic ASR. Accurate position tracking with the MPC running at 47 Hz is achieved in six dynamic experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑