arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2501.18062cs.LGcs.CL
收藏

FinanceQA:评估大型语言模型金融分析能力的基准

FinanceQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Financial Analysis Capabilities of Large Language Models

AfterQuery

Spencer Mateega, Carlos Georgescu, Danny Tang

AI总结:

FinanceQA是一个评估大型语言模型在复杂数值金融分析任务上表现的基准,揭示了当前模型在模拟金融机构实际分析任务中约60%的失败率,并指出需通过高质量训练数据提升其能力。

摘要:

FinanceQA是一个测试套件,用于评估LLMs在反映现实世界投资工作的复杂数值金融分析任务上的表现。尽管近期取得了进展,但当前的LLMs未能满足金融机构严格的准确性要求,在模拟对冲基金、私募股权公司、投资银行等金融机构在职分析的现实任务中,模型失败率约为60%。主要挑战包括手工分摊指标、遵循标准会计和企业估值惯例,以及在信息不完整的情况下进行分析——尤其是在需要生成假设的多步骤任务中。这种性能差距突显了现有LLMs能力与专业金融分析需求之间的脱节,而当前的测试架构未能充分测试这些需求。结果表明,需要更高质量的训练数据来支持此类任务,我们使用OpenAI的微调API对此进行了实验。FinanceQA已在[this https URL](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AfterQuery/FinanceQA)公开发布。

英文摘要:

FinanceQA is a testing suite that evaluates LLMs' performance on complex numerical financial analysis tasks that mirror real-world investment work. Despite recent advances, current LLMs fail to meet the strict accuracy requirements of financial institutions, with models failing approximately 60% of realistic tasks that mimic on-the-job analyses at hedge funds, private equity firms, investment banks, and other financial institutions. The primary challenges include hand-spreading metrics, adhering to standard accounting and corporate valuation conventions, and performing analysis under incomplete information - particularly in multi-step tasks requiring assumption generation. This performance gap highlights the disconnect between existing LLM capabilities and the demands of professional financial analysis that are inadequately tested by current testing architectures. Results show that higher-quality training data is needed to support such tasks, which we experiment with using OpenAI's fine-tuning API. FinanceQA is publicly released at [this https URL](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AfterQuery/FinanceQA).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑