arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.17366cs.LGcs.AIq-fin.CPq-fin.TR
收藏

使用LSTM模型预测S&P 500

Forecasting S&P 500 Using LSTM Models

Prashant Pilla, Raji Mekonen

AI总结:

本研究比较了ARIMA和LSTM模型在预测S&P 500指数上的表现,发现LSTM在MAE、RMSE和准确率上均优于ARIMA,证实了深度学习在处理波动性金融数据方面的潜力。

摘要:

由于受外部因素影响的金融数据具有波动性和复杂性,预测股票市场具有挑战性。ARIMA和GARCH等传统模型在线性数据上表现良好,但在处理非线性依赖关系时存在困难。机器学习和深度学习模型,特别是Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)网络,通过捕捉复杂模式和长期依赖关系来解决这些挑战。本报告比较了ARIMA和LSTM模型在预测主要金融基准S&P 500指数方面的表现。使用历史价格数据和技术指标,我们通过Mean Absolute Error (MAE)和Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE)评估了这些模型。ARIMA模型表现合理,MAE为462.1,RMSE为614,准确率为89.8%,能有效捕捉短期趋势,但受限于其线性假设。LSTM模型利用序列处理能力,以369.32的MAE、412.84的RMSE和92.46%的准确率优于ARIMA,捕捉了短期和长期依赖关系。值得注意的是,没有附加特征的LSTM模型表现最佳,MAE为175.9,RMSE为207.34,准确率为96.41%,展示了其高效处理市场数据的能力。准确预测股票走势对投资策略、风险评估和市场稳定至关重要。我们的发现证实了与传统模型相比,深度学习模型在处理波动性金融数据方面的潜力。结果突出了LSTM的有效性,并提出了进一步改进的途径。本研究提供了对金融预测的见解,对ARIMA和LSTM进行了比较分析,同时概述了它们的优势和局限性。

英文摘要:

With the volatile and complex nature of financial data influenced by external factors, forecasting the stock market is challenging. Traditional models such as ARIMA and GARCH perform well with linear data but struggle with non-linear dependencies. Machine learning and deep learning models, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, address these challenges by capturing intricate patterns and long-term dependencies. This report compares ARIMA and LSTM models in predicting the S&P 500 index, a major financial benchmark. Using historical price data and technical indicators, we evaluated these models using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The ARIMA model showed reasonable performance with an MAE of 462.1, RMSE of 614, and 89.8 percent accuracy, effectively capturing short-term trends but limited by its linear assumptions. The LSTM model, leveraging sequential processing capabilities, outperformed ARIMA with an MAE of 369.32, RMSE of 412.84, and 92.46 percent accuracy, capturing both short- and long-term dependencies. Notably, the LSTM model without additional features performed best, achieving an MAE of 175.9, RMSE of 207.34, and 96.41 percent accuracy, showcasing its ability to handle market data efficiently. Accurately predicting stock movements is crucial for investment strategies, risk assessments, and market stability. Our findings confirm the potential of deep learning models in handling volatile financial data compared to traditional ones. The results highlight the effectiveness of LSTM and suggest avenues for further improvements. This study provides insights into financial forecasting, offering a comparative analysis of ARIMA and LSTM while outlining their strengths and limitations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑