arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2501.17332cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS

面向无障碍应用的紧凑型神经TTS语音

Compact Neural TTS Voices for Accessibility

Apple Inc.(苹果公司)

Kunal Jain, Eoin Murphy, Deepanshu Gupta, Jonathan Dyke, Saumya Shah, Vasilieios Tsiaras, Petko Petkov, Alistair Conkie

AI总结:

本文提出一种高质量紧凑型神经TTS系统,在低功耗设备上实现约15毫秒低延迟与低磁盘占用,解决了传统无障碍应用语音合成在质量、延迟与存储间的权衡问题。

摘要:

面向无障碍应用的当代文本转语音解决方案通常可分为两类:(i) 基于设备的统计参数语音合成(SPSS)或单元选择(USEL),以及(ii) 基于云的神经TTS。SPSS和USEL提供低延迟和低磁盘占用,但牺牲了自然度和音频质量。基于云的神经TTS系统提供显著更好的音频质量和自然度,但在延迟和响应性方面出现退化,使其在实际应用中不切实际。最近,神经TTS模型已可部署在手持设备上运行。然而,延迟仍高于SPSS和USEL,同时磁盘占用使得无法同时预装多个语音。在本工作中,我们描述了一种高质量的紧凑型神经TTS系统,实现了约15毫秒的延迟和低磁盘占用。所提出的解决方案能够在低功耗设备上运行。

英文摘要:

Contemporary text-to-speech solutions for accessibility applications can typically be classified into two categories: (i) device-based statistical parametric speech synthesis (SPSS) or unit selection (USEL) and (ii) cloud-based neural TTS. SPSS and USEL offer low latency and low disk footprint at the expense of naturalness and audio quality. Cloud-based neural TTS systems provide significantly better audio quality and naturalness but regress in terms of latency and responsiveness, rendering these impractical for real-world applications. More recently, neural TTS models were made deployable to run on handheld devices. Nevertheless, latency remains higher than SPSS and USEL, while disk footprint prohibits pre-installation for multiple voices at once. In this work, we describe a high-quality compact neural TTS system achieving latency on the order of 15 ms with low disk footprint. The proposed solution is capable of running on low-power devices.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑