arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.11752cs.CV

生成模型公平吗?皮肤图像生成中的种族偏见研究

Are generative models fair? A study of racial bias in dermatological image generation

Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, Universitat Politècnica de València(瓦伦西亚理工大学 以人为本技术大学研究所);Technical University of Denmark(丹麦技术大学)

Miguel López-Pérez, Søren Hauberg, Aasa Feragen

AI总结:

本文用带感知损失的VAE和Fitzpatrick17k数据集评估皮肤图像生成的种族公平性,发现性能受肤色代表性影响且偏向浅肤色,不确定性估计也无法有效识别偏见。

摘要:

医学领域(例如皮肤病学)中的种族偏见带来了重大的伦理和临床挑战。这之所以可能发生,是因为机器学习模型训练数据集中较深肤色人群的代表性严重不足。尽管解决皮肤病学中偏见的努力一直集中于提高数据集多样性和缓解判别模型中的差异,但种族偏见对生成模型的影响仍未得到充分探索。变分自编码器(VAE)等生成模型正越来越多地用于医疗保健应用,但目前人们尚不清楚它们在不同肤色人群中的公平性。在本研究中,我们评估了临床皮肤病学中生成模型在种族偏见方面的公平性。为此,我们首先训练了一个带感知损失的VAE,以生成和重建不同肤色的高质量皮肤图像。我们利用Fitzpatrick17k数据集来考察种族偏见如何影响这些模型的表征和性能。研究结果表明,正如预期,VAE的性能受代表性影响,即肤色表征的增加会带来该肤色下性能的提升。然而,我们还观察到,即使独立于代表性,VAE对较浅肤色的表现也更好。此外,VAE产生的不确定性估计在评估模型公平性方面是无效的。这些结果凸显出不仅需要更具代表性的皮肤病学数据集,还需要更好地理解此类模型中偏见的来源,并改进不确定性量化机制,以检测和解决生成模型中的种族偏见,从而实现值得信赖的医疗保健技术。

英文摘要:

Racial bias in medicine, such as in dermatology, presents significant ethical and clinical challenges. This is likely to happen because there is a significant underrepresentation of darker skin tones in training datasets for machine learning models. While efforts to address bias in dermatology have focused on improving dataset diversity and mitigating disparities in discriminative models, the impact of racial bias on generative models remains underexplored. Generative models, such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), are increasingly used in healthcare applications, yet their fairness across diverse skin tones is currently not well understood. In this study, we evaluate the fairness of generative models in clinical dermatology with respect to racial bias. For this purpose, we first train a VAE with a perceptual loss to generate and reconstruct high-quality skin images across different skin tones. We utilize the Fitzpatrick17k dataset to examine how racial bias influences the representation and performance of these models. Our findings indicate that VAE performance is, as expected, influenced by representation, i.e. increased skin tone representation comes with increased performance on the given skin tone. However, we also observe, even independently of representation, that the VAE performs better for lighter skin tones. Additionally, the uncertainty estimates produced by the VAE are ineffective in assessing the model's fairness. These results highlight the need for more representative dermatological datasets, but also a need for better understanding the sources of bias in such model, as well as improved uncertainty quantification mechanisms to detect and address racial bias in generative models for trustworthy healthcare technologies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑