arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2501.07458cs.AIcs.PF
收藏

理解与基准测试人工智能:OpenAI的o3并非通用人工智能(AGI)

Understanding and Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence: OpenAI's o3 Is Not AGI

Lab42 AI Research Institute(Lab42人工智能研究院);Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München(慕尼黑大学);Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP)(慕尼黑数学哲学中心)

Rolf Pfister, Hansueli Jud

AI总结:

该研究基于技能与智能的区分提出新的智能定义,分析指出OpenAI的o3靠大量试错预定义操作在ARC-AGI上取得高分,并非AGI,并提出需构建覆盖更多未知任务的新基准以全面评估智能与AGI进展。

摘要:

OpenAI的o3在ARC-AGI(一项用于衡量智能的基准测试)上取得了87.5%的高分。这引发了一个问题:基于大语言模型(LLM)的系统,尤其是o3,是否展现出了智能以及向通用人工智能(AGI)迈进的进展。基于ARC-AGI的创建者François Chollet提出的技能与智能之间的区别,本文引入了一种对智能的新理解:一个智能体在越少知识的支撑下,能在越多样化的世界中越高效地实现越多样化的目标,其智能程度就越高。对ARC-AGI基准的分析表明,其任务代表了一种非常特定的问题类型,这类问题可以通过大量尝试预定义操作的组合来解决。o3也采用了这种方法,通过大量使用计算能力取得了其高分。然而,对于物理世界和人类领域中的大多数问题,解决方案无法提前测试,且预定义的操作也不可用。因此,o3所采用的大量尝试预定义操作的方式不能成为AGI的基础——相反,需要能够在不依赖现有技能的情况下可靠解决各类问题的新方法。为支持这一发展,本文概述了一项新的智能基准测试,它涵盖了种类多得多的待解决未知任务,从而能够对智能以及向AGI迈进的进展进行全面评估。

英文摘要:

OpenAI's o3 achieves a high score of 87.5 % on ARC-AGI, a benchmark proposed to measure intelligence. This raises the question whether systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly o3, demonstrate intelligence and progress towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). Building on the distinction between skills and intelligence made by François Chollet, the creator of ARC-AGI, a new understanding of intelligence is introduced: an agent is the more intelligent, the more efficiently it can achieve the more diverse goals in the more diverse worlds with the less knowledge. An analysis of the ARC-AGI benchmark shows that its tasks represent a very specific type of problem that can be solved by massive trialling of combinations of predefined operations. This method is also applied by o3, achieving its high score through the extensive use of computing power. However, for most problems in the physical world and in the human domain, solutions cannot be tested in advance and predefined operations are not available. Consequently, massive trialling of predefined operations, as o3 does, cannot be a basis for AGI - instead, new approaches are required that can reliably solve a wide variety of problems without existing skills. To support this development, a new benchmark for intelligence is outlined that covers a much higher diversity of unknown tasks to be solved, thus enabling a comprehensive assessment of intelligence and of progress towards AGI.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑