arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.05552cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

意义随时间的动态变化:大型语言模型评估

The dynamics of meaning through time: Assessment of Large Language Models

Egypt University of Informatics(埃及信息大学);AAST College of Artificial Intelligence(AAST人工智能学院);Birmingham City University(伯明翰城市大学)

Mohamed Taher Alrefaie, Fatty Salem, Nour Eldin Morsy, Nada Samir, Mohamed Medhat Gaber

AI总结:

本文通过定制提示、客观指标与专家评价,比较 ChatGPT、GPT-4、Claude 等模型对跨时期术语语义演变的理解,揭示其时间语义能力差异。

摘要:

理解大型语言模型(LLM)如何把握概念的历史语境及其语义演变,对于推进人工智能和语言学研究至关重要。本研究旨在评估各类 LLM 捕捉意义时间动态的能力,特别是它们如何解释不同历史时期的术语。我们分析了来自多个领域的多样化术语集合,使用定制提示词,并通过客观指标(例如困惑度和词数)以及人类专家的主观评价来衡量回答。我们的比较分析包括 ChatGPT、GPT-4、Claude、Bard、Gemini 和 Llama 等知名模型。研究结果揭示了各模型在处理历史语境和语义转变方面存在显著差异,凸显了时间语义理解中的优势与局限。这些洞见为改进 LLM、使其更好地应对语言不断演变的本质提供了基础,并对历史文本分析、AI 设计以及数字人文领域的应用具有启示意义。

英文摘要:

Understanding how large language models (LLMs) grasp the historical context of concepts and their semantic evolution is essential in advancing artificial intelligence and linguistic studies. This study aims to evaluate the capabilities of various LLMs in capturing temporal dynamics of meaning, specifically how they interpret terms across different time periods. We analyze a diverse set of terms from multiple domains, using tailored prompts and measuring responses through both objective metrics (e.g., perplexity and word count) and subjective human expert evaluations. Our comparative analysis includes prominent models like ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, Bard, Gemini, and Llama. Findings reveal marked differences in each model's handling of historical context and semantic shifts, highlighting both strengths and limitations in temporal semantic understanding. These insights offer a foundation for refining LLMs to better address the evolving nature of language, with implications for historical text analysis, AI design, and applications in digital humanities.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑