arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2501.04249cs.CL
收藏

IOLBENCH:在语言推理上对LLM进行基准测试

IOLBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Linguistic Reasoning

University of Michigan(密歇根大学);Microsoft(微软公司)

Satyam Goyal, Soham Dan

AI总结:

本文提出源自国际语言学奥林匹克问题的新型基准IOLBENCH,评估大型语言模型的语言推理能力,发现即便最先进的模型在组合泛化和规则抽象方面仍存在局限。

摘要:

尽管深度神经网络取得了显著进展并得到广泛应用,其执行推理任务的能力依然有限,特别是在需要结构化、抽象思维的领域。本文通过引入IOLBENCH,考察了最先进大型语言模型(LLM)的语言推理能力,这是一个源自国际语言学奥林匹克(IOL)问题的新型基准。该数据集包含测试句法、词法、音系学和语义学的各类问题,均经过精心设计,自包含且不依赖外部知识。这些任务挑战模型进行元认知语言推理,要求从极少示例中推导语言规则与模式。通过对领先LLM的广泛基准测试,我们发现即便最先进的模型也难以应对语言复杂性的细微之处,尤其是在需要组合泛化和规则抽象的领域。我们的分析突显了当前模型在语言问题求解上的优势与持续局限,为其推理能力提供了宝贵见解。通过引入IOLBENCH,我们旨在促进对开发具备类人推理能力模型的进一步研究,对计算语言学和人工智能领域具有更广泛的意义。

英文摘要:

Despite the remarkable advancements and widespread applications of deep neural networks, their ability to perform reasoning tasks remains limited, particularly in domains requiring structured, abstract thought. In this paper, we investigate the linguistic reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) by introducing IOLBENCH, a novel benchmark derived from International Linguistics Olympiad (IOL) problems. This dataset encompasses diverse problems testing syntax, morphology, phonology, and semantics, all carefully designed to be self-contained and independent of external knowledge. These tasks challenge models to engage in metacognitive linguistic reasoning, requiring the deduction of linguistic rules and patterns from minimal examples. Through extensive benchmarking of leading LLMs, we find that even the most advanced models struggle to handle the intricacies of linguistic complexity, particularly in areas demanding compositional generalization and rule abstraction. Our analysis highlights both the strengths and persistent limitations of current models in linguistic problem-solving, offering valuable insights into their reasoning capabilities. By introducing IOLBENCH, we aim to foster further research into developing models capable of human-like reasoning, with broader implications for the fields of computational linguistics and artificial intelligence.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑