arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2501.04068cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

用于一级方程式比赛策略的可解释强化学习

Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Formula One Race Strategy

Imperial College London(帝国理工学院);Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team(梅赛德斯-AMG马石油F1车队)

Devin Thomas, Junqi Jiang, Avinash Kori, Aaron Russo, Steffen Winkler, Stuart Sale, Joseph McMillan, Francesco Belardinelli, Antonio Rago

AI总结:

本文提出强化学习模型 RSRL 用于一级方程式轮胎与进站策略优化,在2023年巴林大奖赛模拟中优于硬编码和 Monte Carlo 基线,并通过泛化训练与决策树可解释性增强可信度。

摘要:

在一级方程式(Formula One)中,各支车队竞相研发赛车,并力求在每场比赛中取得尽可能高的完赛名次。然而,在比赛过程中,车队无法对赛车进行改装,因此必须通过比赛策略来提升赛车的完赛名次,即优化选择为赛车装配何种轮胎配方以及何时进站装配。在本研究中,我们提出了一个强化学习模型 RSRL(Race Strategy Reinforcement Learning,比赛策略强化学习),用于在模拟中控制比赛策略,为业界标准的硬编码及基于 Monte Carlo 的比赛策略提供一种更快的替代方案。在控制赛车速度对应预期完赛名次为 P5.5(其中 P1 表示第一名,P20 为最后一名)的情况下,RSRL 在我们的测试比赛——2023 年巴林大奖赛——上取得了 P5.33 的平均完赛名次,优于最佳基线的 P5.63。随后,我们在一项泛化性研究中展示了如何通过训练来优先优化单一赛道或多条赛道上的表现。此外,我们利用特征重要性、基于决策树的代理模型以及决策树反事实来补充模型预测,以提升用户对模型的信任。最后,我们给出了若干示例,说明该方法在真实场景中的应用,并对模拟与现实进行了类比。

英文摘要:

In Formula One, teams compete to develop their cars and achieve the highest possible finishing position in each race. During a race, however, teams are unable to alter the car, so they must improve their cars' finishing positions via race strategy, i.e. optimising their selection of which tyre compounds to put on the car and when to do so. In this work, we introduce a reinforcement learning model, RSRL (Race Strategy Reinforcement Learning), to control race strategies in simulations, offering a faster alternative to the industry standard of hard-coded and Monte Carlo-based race strategies. Controlling cars with a pace equating to an expected finishing position of P5.5 (where P1 represents first place and P20 is last place), RSRL achieves an average finishing position of P5.33 on our test race, the 2023 Bahrain Grand Prix, outperforming the best baseline of P5.63. We then demonstrate, in a generalisability study, how performance for one track or multiple tracks can be prioritised via training. Further, we supplement model predictions with feature importance, decision tree-based surrogate models, and decision tree counterfactuals towards improving user trust in the model. Finally, we provide illustrations which exemplify our approach in real-world situations, drawing parallels between simulations and reality.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑