arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.03467cs.ROcs.HC
收藏

FRESHR-GSI:面向多人环境中移动机器人的广义安全模型与评估框架

FRESHR-GSI: A Generalized Safety Model and Evaluation Framework for Mobile Robots in Multi-Human Environments

School of Computing, University of Georgia(佐治亚大学计算学院)

Pranav Pandey, Ramviyas Parasuraman, Prashant Doshi

AI总结:

针对移动机器人与多人共享空间的安全评估需求,提出以机器人为中心的FRESHR-GSI框架,融合距离、速度、朝向及RGB-D深度学习检测,实现即时、细粒度的广义安全指数评估。

摘要:

在涉及紧密人机交互(HRI)的应用中,人员安全至关重要,也是人与机器人之间物理兼容性的关键方面。尽管HRI中已有人员安全度量方法,但这些方法主要针对涉及机器人机械臂的工业场景,对移动机器人与人类共享空间的场景关注较少。本文提出一种新的以机器人为中心的方向性人员安全框架,特别适用于评估移动机器人在有多名人员活动的环境中运行时的安全性。该框架整合了若干关键指标,例如每名人员的相对距离、速度和朝向。其核心创新在于框架具有灵活性,能够适应不同应用需求,同时支持以机器人为中心的视角和外部观察者视角。我们通过将基于RGB-D的视觉与基于深度学习的人员检测流水线相结合,对该框架进行实例化,生成可即时评估人员安全的广义安全指数(GSI)。我们在真实世界实验场景中评估了GSI产生适当、鲁棒且细粒度安全度量的能力,并将其性能与现有安全模型进行比较。

英文摘要:

Human safety is critical in applications involving close human-robot interactions (HRI) and is a key aspect of physical compatibility between humans and robots. While measures of human safety in HRI exist, these mainly target industrial settings involving robotic manipulators. Less attention has been paid to settings where mobile robots and humans share the space. This paper introduces a new robot-centered directional framework of human safety. It is particularly useful for evaluating mobile robots as they operate in environments populated by multiple humans. The framework integrates several key metrics, such as each human's relative distance, speed, and orientation. The core novelty lies in the framework's flexibility to accommodate different application requirements while allowing for both the robot-centered and external observer points of view. We instantiate the framework by using RGB-D based vision integrated with a deep learning-based human detection pipeline to yield a generalized safety index (GSI) that instantaneously assesses human safety. We evaluate GSI's capability of producing appropriate, robust, and fine-grained safety measures in real-world experimental scenarios and compare its performance with extant safety models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑