保持分数：CHI 社区如何评价其里程碑的定量分析
Keeping Score: A Quantitative Analysis of How the CHI Community Appreciates Its Milestones
AI总结：
本研究通过分析 CHI 会议录 43 年间的引用数据，揭示了社区对里程碑论文的引用演变，提出里程碑系数并实证了马太效应。
摘要：
ACM CHI 会议有引用其智力遗产的传统。同时，我们知道 CHI 是高度多样化和不断发展的。在这个高度动态的背景下，尚不清楚 CHI 社区如何继续欣赏其里程碑（在 CHI 内部和外部）。我们调查了社区对里程碑的引用在 CHI 会议录 43 年（1981-2024 年）中是如何演变的。每年绘制的遗忘曲线表明，里程碑正逐渐从 CHI 社区的集体记忆中消失。然而，当我们追踪对引用最多的里程碑的引用随时间的变化时，情况更加微妙。我们识别出在 CHI 中被引用的三种不同类型的里程碑，一个里程碑贡献的类型学，并定义里程碑系数作为一个度量，以在连续尺度上评估里程碑论文的影响。此外，我们提供了 CHI 中马太效应的经验证据。我们讨论了这对 CHI 社区和人机交互领域的更广泛影响。
英文摘要：
The ACM CHI Conference has a tradition of citing its intellectual heritage. At the same time, we know CHI is highly diverse and evolving. In this highly dynamic context, it is not clear how the CHI community continues to appreciate its milestones (within and outside of CHI). We present an investigation into how the community's citations to milestones have evolved over 43 years of CHI Proceedings (1981-2024). Forgetting curves plotted for each year suggest that milestones are slowly fading from the CHI community's collective memory. However, the picture is more nuanced when we trace citations to the top-cited milestones over time. We identify three distinct types of milestones cited at CHI, a typology of milestone contributions, and define the Milestone Coefficient as a metric to assess the impact of milestone papers on a continuous scale. Further, we provide empirical evidence of a Matthew effect at CHI. We discuss the broader ramifications for the CHI community and the field of HCI.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
