arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2412.16725cs.AI

通过抽象论证增强语言模型的冲突解决能力

Enhancing Conflict Resolution in Language Models via Abstract Argumentation

School of Philosophy, Zhejiang University(浙江大学哲学系);College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University(浙江大学计算机科学与技术学院);The State Key Lab of Brain-Machine Intelligence(脑机智能国家重点实验室)

Zhaoqun Li, Xiaotong Fang, Chen Chen, Mengze Li, Beishui Liao

AI总结:

针对大语言模型难以处理信息不完整/不一致引发冲突的问题,本文结合抽象论证框架构建带计算过程解释的数据集微调模型,提升了冲突解决泛化准确率与模型透明度。

摘要:

近年来,大语言模型(LLMs)在构建类人化、高交互性对话系统方面取得了显著进展。但在共识构建、说服等任务中,LLMs往往难以解决由信息不完整或不一致引发的冲突,暴露出其在现实应用中的局限性。针对这些缺陷,专门用于解决冲突与不一致性的逻辑框架——抽象论证(abstract argumentation)具备极高的应用价值。本文旨在通过利用形式化抽象论证,将语言模型学习与符号计算相结合,提升LLMs的冲突解决能力。为此,我们构建并整理了一个包含多样化抽象论证框架的数据集,附带论证可接受性计算过程的详细解释。随后,我们在该数据集上对LLMs进行微调,聚焦抽象冲突解决任务。作为对比基准,我们还采用思维链方法对LLMs进行评估,但该方法无法有效解决基于冲突的论证问题。实验表明,过程解释在学习中起到关键作用:相较于仅使用问答对训练的模型,结合解释训练的模型展现出更优的泛化准确率。此外,借助LLMs的自解释能力,我们的方法可提供详细说明,缓解神经网络普遍存在的透明度不足问题。

英文摘要:

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in developing human-like and engaging dialogue systems. However, in tasks such as consensus-building and persuasion, LLMs often struggle to resolve conflicts arising from incomplete or inconsistent information, revealing their limitations in real-world applications. Given these limitations, abstract argumentation, a specialized logical framework designed to resolve conflicts and inconsistencies, becomes particularly relevant. In this paper, we aim to enhance the conflict-solving capabilities of LLMs by leveraging formal abstract argumentation, integrating language model learning with symbolic computation. To achieve this, we develop and curate a dataset comprising diverse abstract argumentation frameworks, accompanied by detailed explanations of the argument acceptability computation process. Subsequently, we fine-tune LLMs on this dataset, focusing on abstract conflict resolution tasks. As a comparative baseline, LLMs are also evaluated using a chain-of-thought approach, however, they fail to solve the conflict-based arguments effectively. Our experiments demonstrate that process explanations play a crucial role in learning. Models trained with explanations exhibit superior generalization accuracy compared to those trained solely on question-answer pairs. Furthermore, leveraging LLMs' self-explanation capabilities, our approach provides detailed illustrations that mitigate the lack of transparency typically associated with neural networks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑